Unformatted text preview: 16.030/16.040 SP2 Part II Grading Sheet – Spring 2004 Element
Systems Requirements Document
1.0 Scope. Scope properly and succinctly defined.
2.0 System Boundary. System boundary (what)
well defined addressing people, process and
3.0 System Requirements. System requirements
(what) well defined addressing people, process and
4.0 Resources. Appropriate resources – time,
material, people – specified.
5.0 Constraints. Appropriate constraints – time,
material, people – specified. Strategy
Two to three well structured, clear and concise
paragraphs describing a strategy to achieve
competition system requirements. FRDIARCC Table
Functional Requirements. System requirements
transferred to table (people, product, process).
Design Ideas (how). Design ideas corresponding to
functional requirements present. Design ideas in
sync with strategy. Design ideas for landing
aircraft and loading payload present
Rest of FRDIARCC table columns completed.
Adequate documentation present. 1 Performance Level
5 Comments 16.030/16.040 SP2 Part II Grading Sheet – Spring 2004 WBS and Gantt Chart
Neatly drawn and well documented WBS chart.
Neatly drawn, well documented and annotated
Gantt chart. Baseline Build Report
All request data present and presented in a well
organized, well documented and annotated,
professional manner. Baseline Test Plan
Test plan contains well documented test
procedures. Test plan includes well chosen test
criteria that can be measured. Measurement
procedures are clearly presented. Team:___________ Version: Evaluators: _________________________ Grade:________ Performance Levels*
CR Credit Coverage and/or correctness of content demonstrates adequate to superior understanding of the subject
matter, an adequate to extensive knowledge of subject matter, an adequate to skillful ability to use
concepts. NC No Credit Non-acceptable performance. 5 Exceptionally good Coverage and/or correctness of content demonstrates superior understanding of the subject matter, a
foundation of extensive knowledge, an ability to skillfully use concepts. 4 Good performance Coverage and/or correctness of content demonstrates a good understanding of the subject matter,
capability for use of the relevant concepts. 16.030/16.040 SP2 Part II Grading Sheet – Spring 2004 3 Adequate Coverage and/or correctness of content demonstrates adequate understanding of the relevant material, an
ability to apply the concepts in a relatively simple manner. * These performance levels are paraphrased from the definition of MIT grades given in the Bulletin and at
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 01/28/2012 for the course AERO 16.01 taught by Professor Markdrela during the Fall '05 term at MIT.
- Fall '05