sp4grading_rubirc

sp4grading_rubirc - 16.030/040 SP4 Grading Sheet - Spring...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: 16.030/040 SP4 Grading Sheet - Spring 2004 Performance Level (see last sheet for definitions) Technical Element Believable calculations under reasonable Legible plot clearly and correctly labeled. Operating point clearly labeled. Logical Legible plot clearly and correctly labeled. Maximum velocity clearly labeled. Credible comparison discussion. 4. Efficiency and Output Power Legible plots clearly and correctly labeled. 5. Power Required and Available Legible plots clearly and correctly labeled. Credible and insightful conclusions drawn in commentary. 6. Estimate of Stall Speed Credible estimate approach. Credible calculation under reasonable theoretical and/or measurement assumptions. NC 3 4 5 Comments 16.030/040 SP4 Grading Sheet - Spring 2004 7. Minimum Turning Radius Estimate/Measure Reasonable estimate. Clear presentation and discussion of measurement technique present. Intelligent comparison. 8. Ground Roll Estimate/Measure Reasonable estimate. Clear presentation and discussion of measurement technique present. Intelligent comparison. 9. Comparison Clear, concise, and insightful comparison of estimated and measured quantities. Intelligent conclusions and recommendations. Overall Evaluation Team:________________________ Version: Evaluators: _______________________ Assessment: _______ 16.030/040 SP4 Grading Sheet - Spring 2004 Performance Level (see last sheet for definitions) Element Cover sheet with appropriate information All required sections and sub-sections present and properly labeled. Page numbers; tables, figures, and equations labeled Acronyms and numbers used conventionally Citations done properly (when appropriate) Ideas flow logically from sentence to sentences, from paragraph to paragraph, Document shows evidence that writer has considered a mixed audience and provided Language is used grammatically; punctuation is correct; words are spelled Writing is concise. Overall Evaluation NC 3 4 5 Comments 16.030/040 SP4 Grading Sheet - Spring 2004 Team:________________________ Version: Evaluators: _______________________ Assessment: _______ 16.030/040 SP4 Grading Sheet - Spring 2004 Performance Levels* CR Credit Coverage and/or correctness of content demonstrates adequate to superior understanding of the subject matter, an adequate to extensive knowledge of subject matter, an adequate to skillful ability to use concepts. NC No Credit Non-acceptable performance. Resubmit. 5 Exceptionally good Coverage and/or correctness of content demonstrates superior understanding of the subject matter, a foundation of extensive knowledge, an ability to skillfully use concepts. 4 Good performance Coverage and/or correctness of content demonstrates a good understanding of the subject matter, capability for use of the relevant concepts. 3 Adequate Coverage and/or correctness of content demonstrates adequate understanding of the relevant material, an ability to apply the concepts in a relatively simple manner. Can be improved. * These performance levels are paraphrased and modified from the definition of MIT grades given in the Bulletin and at http://web.mit.edu/faculty/rules/2.60.html ...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 01/28/2012 for the course AERO 16.01 taught by Professor Markdrela during the Fall '05 term at MIT.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online