chem233_postlab9 - Post Lab 9: Electrophilic Aromatic...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Post Lab 9: Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution 1. Some chemical reasons for not obtaining a 100% yield of product could be that ortho and para products were formed instead of methyl m-nitrobenzoate. Physical reasons include losing part of the reactants during steps that involved transfer and filtration. Our filtration was problematic, as the crystallized product flowed through the filter paper and into the flask on our first trial, and some still went through after our second and final attempt. 2. Based on the melting point of our product, which was 77.1-79.5°C, our product was highly pure as it this relates very closely to the literature melting point of 78-80°C. It could have improved, however, by performing the vacuum filtration step again, as ours specifically, let the product go through, and thus was not very distinguishable from the rest of the mixture. The TLC also showed the product was different from methyl benzoate, so there was not much reactant left, which means it was fairly pure. 3. The IR spectra of the reactant should be very similar to the product with the only difference
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 01/29/2012 for the course CHEM 233 taught by Professor Staff during the Spring '08 term at University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online