Solutions_F11_ECH157_HW6

Solutions_F11_ECH157_HW6 - 14.8 Kcu and c are obtained...

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: 14.8 Kcu and c are obtained using Eqs. 14-7 and 14-8. Including the filter GF into these equations gives -180 = 0 + [-0.2c tan-1(c)]+[-tan-1(Fc)] Solving, c = 8.443 c = 5.985 for for F = 0 F = 0.1 Then from Eq. 14-8, 2 1 1 K cu 2 2 2 c 1 F c 1 Solving for Kcu gives, Kcu = 4.251 Kcu = 3.536 for for F = 0 F = 0.1 for for F = 0 F = 0.1 Therefore, cKcu = 35.9 c Kcu= 21.2 Because cKcu is lower for F = 0.1, filtering the measurement results in worse control performance. 1 14.9 (a) Using Eqs. 14-7 and 14-8, 5 1 1 (1.0) AR OL K c 1 2 2 2 25 100 1 1 = tan-1(-1/5) + 0 + (-2 tan-1(10)) + (- tan-1()) 14-11 Bode Diagram 2 10 1 AR/Kc 10 0 10 -1 10 -2 10 -100 Phase (deg) -150 -200 -250 -300 -350 -2 10 -1 0 10 10 1 10 2 10 Frequency (rad/sec) Figure S14.9a. Bode plot (b) Set = 180 and solve for to obtain c = 0.4695. Then AR OL = 1 = Kcu(1.025) c Therefore, Kcu = 1/1.025 = 0.976 and the closed-loop system is stable for Kc 0.976. (c) For Kc = 0.2, set AROL = 1 and solve for to obtain g = 0.1404. Then g = = -133.6 g From Eq. 14-12, PM = 180 + g = 46.4 (d) From Eq. 14-11 14-12 GM = 1.7 = From part (b), Therefore, 1 1 = Ac AR OL AR OL c c = 1.025 Kc 1.025 Kc = 1/1.7 or Kc = 0.574 Bode Diagram 2 10 1 AR/Kc 10 0 10 -1 10 -2 10 -150 Phase (deg) -180 -200 -250 -300 -350 -2 10 -1 0 10 10 1 10 2 10 Frequency (rad/sec) Figure S14.9b. Solution for part b) using Bode plot. Bode Diagram 2 10 1 AR/Kc 10 0 10 -1 10 -2 10 -150 Phase (deg) -180 -200 -250 -300 -350 -2 10 -1 0 10 10 1 10 2 10 Frequency (rad/sec) Figure S14.9c. Solution for part c) using Bode plot. 14-13 2 14.12 (a) Schematic diagram: TC Hot fluid TT Cold fluid Mixing Point Sensor Block diagram: (b) GvGpGm = Km = 6 mA/mA GTL = e-8s GOL = GvGpGmGTL = 6e-8s If GOL = 6e-8s, | GOL(j) | = 6 GOL (j) = -8 rad Find c: Crossover frequency generates 180 phase angle = radians -8c = - or c = /8 rad/s 14-19 2 16s /8 c 1 1 Find Kcu: Kcu = 0.167 | G p ( j c ) | 6 Find Pu: Pu = 2 Ziegler-Nichols ¼ decay ratio settings: PI controller: Kc = 0.45 Kcu = (0.45)(0.167) = 0.075 I = Pu/1.2 = 16/1.2 = 13.33 sec PID controller: Kc = 0.6 Kcu = (0.6)(0.167) = 0.100 I = Pu/2 = 16/2 = 8 s D = Pu/8 = 16/8 = 2 s (c) 1.4 1.2 1 y 0.8 PID control PI control 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 30 60 90 120 t Fig. S14.12. Set-point responses for PI and PID control. 14-20 150 (d) Derivative control action reduces the settling time but results in a more oscillatory response. (a) From Exercise 14.10, 14.13 Gv ( s ) 5.264 0.083s 1 2 (0.432s 1)(0.017 s 1) 0.12 Gm ( s) (0.024s 1) 1 The PI controller is Gc ( s ) 51 0.3s Hence the open-loop transfer function is G p ( s) GOL Gc Gv G p Gm Rearranging, GOL 6.317 s 21.06 1.46 10 s 0.00168s 4 0.05738s 3 0.556s 2 s 5 5 14-21 123456789 8 3 16.1 The difference between systems A and B lies in the dynamic lag in the measurement elements Gm1 (primary loop) and Gm2(secondary loop). With a faster measurement device in A, better control action is achieved. In addition, for a cascade control system to function properly, the response of the secondary control loop should be faster than the primary loop. Hence System A should be faster and yield better closed-loop performance than B. Because Gm2 in system B has an appreciable lag, cascade control has the potential to improve the overall closed-loop performance more than for system A. Little improvement in system A can be achieved by cascade control versus conventional feedback. Comparisons are shown in Figs. S16.1a/b. PI controllers are used in the outer loop. The PI controllers for both System A and System B are designed based on Table 12.1 (τc = 3). P controllers are used in the inner loops. Because of different dynamics the proportional controller gain of System B is about one-fourth as large as the controller gain of System A System A: Kc2 = 1 System B: Kc2 = 0.25 τI=15 τI=15 Kc1=0.5 Kc1=2.5 0.7 Cascade Standard feedback 0.6 0.5 Output 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 time Figure S16.1a. System A. Comparison of D2 responses (D2=1/s) for cascade control and conventional PI control. Solution Manual for Process Dynamics and Control, 2nd edition, Copyright © 2004 by Dale E. Seborg, Thomas F. Edgar and Duncan A. Mellichamp 16-1 In comparing the two figures, it appears that the standard feedback results are essentially the same, but the cascade response for system A is much faster and has much less absolute error than for the cascade control of B 0.7 Cascade Standard feedback 0.6 0.5 Output 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 time 60 70 80 90 100 Figure S16.1b. System B .Comparison of D2 responses (D2=1/s) for cascade control and conventional PI control. Figure S16.1c. Block diagram for System A 16-2 Figure S16.1d. Block diagram for System B 16.2 a) The transfer function between Y1 and D1 is Y1 = D1 Gd 1 ⎛ ⎞ Gc 2Gv 1 + Gc1 ⎜ ⎟ G p Gm1 ⎝ 1 + Gc 2GvGm 2 ⎠ and that between Y1 and D2 is G p Gd 2 Y1 = D2 1 + Gc 2Gv Gm 2 + Gc 2Gv Gm1Gc1G p using Gv = Gp = 5 s +1 , Gd 2 = 1 , 4 , Gm1 = 0.05 , (2s + 1)(4s + 1) 16-3 Gd 1 = 1 , 3s + 1 Gm 2 = 0.2 The complex closed-loop poles arise when the characteristic polynomial is factored. This polynomial is (s2 + s + 0.313) = (s + 0.5 + 0.25 i) (s + 0.5 −0.25i) 1+ 6 ⎛ τ s +1 ⎞ s +1 s +1 + Kc ⎜ I =0 ⎟6 s −3 ⎝ τI s ⎠ s − 3 1 ( τ I + 6τ I + K c 6 τ I ) s 2 + (−3τ I + 6τ I + 6τ I K c + 6 K c ) s + Kc 6 = 0 The poles are also the roots of the characteristic equation: Hence, the PI controller parameters can be found easily: K c = 0.052 τ I = 0.137 4 16.7 Using MATLAB-Simulink, the block diagram for the closed-loop system is shown below. Figure S16.7a. Block diagram for Smith predictor 16-14 represents the time-delay term e-θs. where the block The closed-loop response for unit set-point and disturbance changes are shown below. Consider a PI controller designed by using Table 12.1(Case A) with τc = 3 and set Gd = Gp. Note that no offset occurs, Servo response Regulatory response 1.2 1 Output 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 5 10 15 time 20 25 30 Figure S16.7b. Closed-loop response for setpoint and disturbance changes. 16.8 The block diagram for the closed-loop system is Figure S6.8. Block diagram for the closed-loop system ⎛ 1 + τI s ⎞ where Gc = K c ⎜ −θs ⎟ ⎝ 1 + τI s − e ⎠ 16-15 and Gp = K p e−θs 1 + τs 15.3 (a) The block diagram is the same as in Fig. 15.11 where Y H2, Ym H2m, Ysp H2sp, D Q1, Dm Q1m, and U Q3. b) (A steady-state mass balance on both tanks gives 0 = q1 – q3 or Q1 = Q3 (in deviation variables) (1) From the block diagram, at steady state: Q3 = Kv Kf Kt Q1 From (1) and (2), Kf = 1 K v Kt (2) c) 5 (No, because Eq. 1 above does not involve q2. (b) From the block diagram, exact feedforward compensation for Q1 would result when 15.4 Q1 + Q2 = 0 Substituting Gf = Q2 = KV Gf Kt Q1, 1 K v Kt 15-2 (c) Same as part (b), because the feedforward loop does not have any dynamic elements. (d) For exact feedforward compensation Q4 + Q3 = 0 From the block diagram, (1) Q2 = KV Gf Kt Q4 (2) Using steady-state analysis, a mass balance on tank 1 for no variation in q1 gives Q2 Q3 = 0 (3) Substituting for Q3 from (3) and (2) into (1) gives Q4 + KV Gf Kt Q4 = 0 Gf = or 1 K v Kt For dynamic analysis, find Gp1 from a mass balance on tank 1, A1 dh1 q1 q2 C1 h1 dt 15-3 Linearizing (4), noting that q1 = 0, and taking Laplace transforms: A1 dh C q2 1 h1 dt 2h 1 or (2 h1 / C1) H1( s) Q2 ( s) (2 A h / C ) s 1 111 q3 C1 h1 Since q3 C1 2 h1 or h1 (5) Q3 ( s ) C 1 H1 ( s) 2 h 1 (6) From (5) and (6), Q3 ( s) 1 GP1 Q2 ( s) (2 A h / C ) s 1 111 Substituting for Q3 from (7) and (2) into (1) gives Q4 ( or 1 ) K v G f Kt Q4 0 (2 A1 h1 / C1 ) s 1 Gf 1 [(2 A1 h1 / C1 ) s 1] K v Kt 15.5 (a) For a steady-state analysis: Gp=1, Gd=2, From Eq.15-21, Gf = (b) Gd 2 2 Gv Gt G p (1)(1)(1) Using Eq. 15-21, 15-4 Gv = Gm = Gt =1 (7) ...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 01/28/2012 for the course ECH 157 taught by Professor Palagozu during the Fall '08 term at UC Davis.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online