Slavery and the Three

Slavery and the Three - Slavery and the Three-Fifths...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Slavery and the Three-Fifths Compromise Delegates also debated about how slavery should affect representation in the House of Representatives. Roughly 90 percent of slaves in 1787 lived in the South and accounted for about 30 percent of the southern population. Southern delegates wanted slaves to be counted as people only when determining representation in Congress because a larger population meant more representatives and therefore more political power. Northern delegates opposed this view, however, and did not want slaves to be counted as people when determining a state’s population. According to the Three-Fifths Compromise, which resolved the dispute, slaves would be counted as three-fifths of a person when apportioning seats in the House of Representatives. Effects of the Three-Fifths Compromise The Three-Fifths Compromise was probably necessary to keep the states together as a united country. Had slavery been banned outright, southern states would probably have walked out of the convention, possibly leading to the...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 01/31/2012 for the course POS POS2112 taught by Professor Leslietaylor during the Winter '09 term at Broward College.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online