hw7solns

# Hw7solns - 151A HW 7 Solutions Will Feldman 1 This is not difficult just plug the values given in the problem into the second difference quotient

This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: 151A HW 7 Solutions Will Feldman 1. This is not difficult just plug the values given in the problem into the second difference quotient formula f 00 ( x ) ≈ f ( x + h )- 2 f ( x ) + f ( x- h ) h 2 for h = 0 . 1 , . 01. The interesting part is that the approximation for h = 0 . 1 is better than the approximation for 0 . 01. This is due to rounding error. By using the data given in the table you are using approximations to f which are accurate up to = 5 × 10- 6 . Let ˜ f ( x ) be our approximation to the value of f at x which satisfies | ˜ f ( x )- f ( x ) | ≤ , i.e. it is an approximation of the actual value of f at x with error less than . Then the second difference quotient with ˜ f instead of f has the error, | ˜ f ( x + h )- 2 ˜ f ( x ) + ˜ f ( x- h ) h 2- f 00 ( x ) | ≤ | ˜ f ( x + h )- 2 ˜ f ( x ) + ˜ f ( x- h ) h 2- f ( x + h )- 2 f ( x ) + f ( x- h ) h 2 | + | f ( x + h )- 2 f ( x ) + f ( x- h ) h 2- f 00 ( x ) | ≤ 4 h 2 + h 2 M 12 where M is an upper bound for...
View Full Document

## This note was uploaded on 01/30/2012 for the course MATH 131a taught by Professor Hitrik during the Spring '08 term at UCLA.

### Page1 / 2

Hw7solns - 151A HW 7 Solutions Will Feldman 1 This is not difficult just plug the values given in the problem into the second difference quotient

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online