f_0016605_14357 - Whose Agenda Is Served by the Idea of a...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations, Vol. 8, No. 1, Spring 2009 114 Whose Agenda Is Served by the Idea of a Shia Crescent? Amir M. Haji-Yousefi * Abstract After the American invasion of Iraq in 2003, it became evident that Iraq’s Shia majority would dominate the future government if a free election was going to be held. In 2004, Jordan’s King Abdullah, anxiously warned of the prospect of a “Shia crescent” spanning Iran, Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon. This idea was then picked up by others in the Arab world, especially Egypt’s President Mubarak and some elements within the Saudi government, to reaffirm the Iranian ambitions and portray its threats with regard to the Middle East. This article seeks to unearth the main causes of promoting the idea of a revived Shiism by some Arab countries, and argue that it was basically proposed out of the fear that what the American occupation of Iraq unleashed in the region would drastically change the old Arab order in which Sunni governments were dominant. While Iran downplayed the idea and perceived it as a new American conspiracy, it was grabbed by the Bush administration to intensify its pressures on Iran. It also sought to rally support in the Arab world for US Middle East policy in general, and its failed policy toward Iraq in particular. Thus, to answer the above mentioned question, a close attention would be paid to both the Arab and Iranian agenda in the Middle East after the overthrow of Saddam Hussein in order to establish which entities benefit most from the perception of a Shia crescent. The difference between the two main schools of thought in Islam, Shiism and Sunnism , is mainly based on the issue of who should have led Islam after the death of the Prophet Muhammad. Shia believe that Imam Ali, the prophet’s son-in-law, and his descendants (the progeny of the prophet Muhammad) were the true successors of the prophet, while Sunnis believe that Abubakr, Umar, Uthman and finally Ali , have been the true leaders of Islam. The
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations, Vol. 8, No. 1, Spring 2009 115 divide between Shiism and Sunnisim is an ideological one which still exists. This division, however, has been reinforced by national, ethnic, political, social, and even economic divides in the Islamic world and has been manipulated throughout the history by some rulers, politicians and colonialists to serve their own immediate interests. Most notably, after the American occupation of Iraq in 2003, some have tried to draw geopolitical lines and differences between Shia and Sunni. They have contemplated that Iran, being the strongest Shiite country in the Middle East, is trying to create a Shia geo-political region which counters the so - called Sunni geo-political turf and to advance its national goals and objectives. Political analysts and politicians alike believe that the rise of the Shia will lead to a new Middle East drawn upon religious lines. Discussing the different claims to the creation of the Shia crescent
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 02/01/2012 for the course HIST 101 taught by Professor Wormer during the Fall '08 term at Boise State.

Page1 / 22

f_0016605_14357 - Whose Agenda Is Served by the Idea of a...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online