tjir_v1n1aca01

tjir_v1n1aca01 - THE CASE OF JERUSALEM FROM A...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations, Vol.1, No.1, (Spring 2002) THE CASE OF JERUSALEM FROM A CIVILIZATIONAL PERSPECTIVE 1 Alpaslan Açikgenç* This paper is an attempt to evaluate an international political problem from a philosophical perspective in order to see its actual place within a civilizational phenomenon. How Muslims view Jerusalem and how it is to be viewed from historical perspective are the main issues to be evaluated. The historical approach shall attempt to provide a framework for treating the problem. This framework includes the concept of civilization and the phenomenon of the rise and fall of civilizations. Certain historical facts may lead us to clues for unraveling our perception of the Jerusalem issue today. We shall then begin our treatment of the problem from evaluating the concept of civilization. The idea of civilization was first introduced by the French thinkers in the eighteenth century in order to distinguish between barbarism and a civilized society. 2 Three main criteria was introduced then to distinguish between a culture (a primitive society) and a civilization (a civilized society); 1. settled vs. nomad, 2. urban vs. rural, 3. literate vs. illiterate. If this is the case, then a civilization cannot be defined conclusively because the French approach seems to concentrate on how to distinguish the civilized from the uncivilized, whereas a culture may perfectly be civilized without being a civilization. Therefore, we need a definition of civilization which is broader in its scope. If we examine past civilizations we will see that it is externally hard to distinguish them from cultures except that they are much broader and include more than one culture; hence, a civilization is in fact “a universalized culture.” This means that a civilization is in the true sense a culture which is no longer limited to its local and national confines. As such it begins to include within its boundaries many sub-cultures,
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations, Vol.1, No.1, (Spring 2002 2 all of which are very much colored by the foundational culture that has become an all- embracing culture, namely a civilization. It is possible to find such a culture in the ultimate analysis of every true civilization. Our definition of a civilization enables us to distinguish the following criteria for civilizations: universality; multi-culturality; having an official language that characterizes its literature, whether scientific or artistic. If a culture does not have these characteristics it cannot be called ‘civilization’. It is clear that the most important aspect of a civilization is its universality; and in fact all other aspects can be reduced to this one. That is why we have tried to give our definition of civilizations in terms of universality alone.
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 11

tjir_v1n1aca01 - THE CASE OF JERUSALEM FROM A...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online