The Legal and Regulatory Environment of Business

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Case 09 Case 9-1 (Chapter 9, p. 267) NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. KIRBY, PTY, LTD., DBA KIRBY ENGINEERING 125 S.Ct. 385 (2004) FACTS: To transport its manufacturing goods from Australia to Huntsville, Alabama, Kirby contracted with International Cargo Control (ICC), a freight forwarding company. These goods were to be shipped in 10 containers. These containers traveled by ship from Australia to Savannah, Georgia. Then they were placed on a Norfolk Southern train for delivery to Huntsville. During this final leg of the trip, the containers and the contents were damaged when the train derailed. Kirby claims a loss of $1,500,000 and sued Norfolk Southern. The railway company claims its liability is limited by the terms of the bill of lading issued by ICC to Kirby. [NOTE: A second bill of lading issued by the actual shipping company to ICC contains similar limitation of liability causes.] The 11 th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Kirby, and Norfolk Southern was granted certiorari by the
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.
  • Bill of lading, Shipping, Intermodal freight transport, Commercial item transport and distribution, Norfolk Southern, Norfolk Southern Railway

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page1 / 2

Chap009Cases - Case 09 Case 9-1(Chapter 9 p 267 NORFOLK...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online