Drug use and Abuse

Drug use and Abuse - Drug Use and Abuse The is little doubt...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Drug Use and Abuse The is little doubt that drug use constitutes one of the most serious problems facing North American society in the twenty first century. This opinion is shared by politicians, police officials, media commentators, the general public and even the drug users themselves. In truth, there may well be considerable evidence to support this contention. Recent estimates suggest that over 13 million Americans (approximately 6% of the population) use drugs regularly (Hanson & Venturelli, 1999). Other researchers argue that the United States has the highest number of heroin addicts in the world (Meier & Geis, 1997). These figures are alarming and help explain why many people believe that drugs are a scourge that ruin lives, cause crime and undermine the foundations of society. For these people, it is clear that drug use must be eliminated, and that American society is justified in using whatever measures are necessary to achieve this end. It is this mind set that has fueled the current war against drugs that annually costs the United States government over 20 billion dollars (Jacobs, 2001). This figure does not include the expenditures of state and local governments, and thus the total enforcement costs are actually much higher. Globally, the costs of drug enforcement efforts are astronomical and cannot be estimated with any degree of accuracy. What is unclear in the present debate is the degree to which drug enforcement efforts are effective at stemming drug use or whether they may actually be exacerbating the problem. Indeed, there is little evidence that tough enforcement provisions actually deter drug use. For example, during the late 1970’s, the United States, Iran, and Singapore had extremely high rates of heroin addiction, despite the fact that they also employed some of the most stringent legal remedies. Although Iran and Singapore actually used the death penalty extensively for drug trafficking, it did not appear to have much effect on the number of addicts. In contrast, Canada, which employs a much more lenient approach to drug control, had an addiction rate that was one-third that of the United States and even further behind that of Iran and Singapore. 1 1 These figures are extrapolated from data reported by Treback (1982, cited in Meier & Geis, 1997). Of course it must be noted that there are many other factors, including poverty, cultural practices and lifestyle, that will affect drug use in addition to enforcement practices. Nevertheless, these figures do suggest that strict enforcement is not likely to solve the drug problem by itself. 1
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Although the proponents of the war on drugs are currently the driving force behind global drug policy, it is also clear that there is considerable debate and controversy regarding many basic issues involved in the drug debate. For example, there is widespread disagreement over the nature, extent and origins of the drug problem, the best way of handling it and even over the definition of “drugs”. The latter controversy is
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 27

Drug use and Abuse - Drug Use and Abuse The is little doubt...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online