transcript06 -...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Frontiers and Controversies in Astrophysics: Lecture 6 Transcript February 1, 2007 << back Professor Charles Bailyn: You'll recall that where we got to last time is that there are lots of Hot Jupiters; lots of Hot Jupiters. And the alternative theories that were presented to explain the evidence for Hot Jupiters--the evidence for Hot Jupiters comes in this form of these velocity curves, where you plot the radial velocity versus time of the star. And the star goes back and forth, and you infer from that that there must be a planet going around it, which is pulling the star back and forth. And some alternative explanations were proposed to explain these kinds of data. Those alternative explanations didn't seem to work very well, and so you have to kind of take the Hot Jupiters seriously. Before I go on, let me mention that, by now, Hot Jupiters are not the only kind of planets that have been seen this way. There are also planets in--now known to have much longer orbits, up to a few years. These are harder to see for two reasons. First of all, it takes you a few years to see them. And second of all, when the orbits get longer, the velocities that they induce go down, because things in long orbits go slowly. But, nevertheless, now we've been able to see a bunch of things. Oddly, in many cases, they turn out to have highly elliptical orbits, in some cases. Not the Hot Jupiters, not the ones that are close in. Those all are more or less circular. But some of these longer ones have highly elliptical orbits. That's also very weird in terms of our theories of planetary formation because one of the things that our theories were designed to explain was the fact that all the major planets in our own Solar System have orbits that are close to circular. It does a very good job of explaining that and then, naturally enough, has trouble explaining the ones we see that are in highly elliptical orbits--highly elliptical--yes, I didn't--highly elliptical orbits, in some cases. And just so you know, the way you recognize a highly elliptical orbit is it's not sinusoidal anymore. It's got some other shape. So, these come in: periodic but non-sinusoidal velocity curves. So, all this is very amusing and you pile up all these very strange kinds of planets, or what you think are planets. But there's still sort of the nagging question of whether these radial velocity curves might be explainable in some other way. And it would be awfully nice to have evidence of some other kind for the existence of these planets. This is, you know, what happens in science. You find some kind of fairly strong evidence for something, but it would be way stronger if you found two different kinds of evidence. Different--collected in different ways or reflecting different aspects of what you're observing that both point in the same direction.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 02/06/2012 for the course ASTR 160 taught by Professor Charlesbailyn during the Spring '06 term at Yale.

Page1 / 10

transcript06 -...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online