transcript22

transcript22 -...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Frontiers and Controversies in Astrophysics: Lecture 22 Transcript April 19, 2007 << back Professor Charles Bailyn: We had gotten, at the end of last time, to the Big Rip. This is where the ever-expanding Cosmological Constant--which is, of course, a contradiction in terms. If you imagine that dark energy is not a Cosmological Constant, that it's actually increasing in time, rips everything to shreds. The Universe becomes infinite in size in a finite amount of time and everything gets pulled apart. What I want to start by doing today is to go back and do that again slowly, okay? Because I think this is not a simple line of reasoning that leads you to this. So, let's go all the way back to what we know about the Universe from observing galaxies, supernovas, things like that. We know that the Universe is expanding and that, we know. Hubble already figured that out. We know this from the Hubble Law, and from other--just, in general, from the study of standard candles at relatively low redshift. So, distances out to, I don't know, Z of less than 0.2, or so. You can't tell the difference between an accelerating or a decelerating Universe. All you know is that it's expanding, and you can figure out how fast it's expanding. Now, the next question then becomes the rate of expansion. Is the rate of expansion changing? Is it accelerating? Is it decelerating? What's going on there? And so, you want to compare acceleration versus deceleration, which is a fancy word, as you know, for slowing down. And deceleration: this is relatively easy to grasp. This is what happens because of matter. Matter exists. It's got gravitational force, and gravitational force tends to hold things together. So, if you've got something that's moving apart, and there's some gravitational force, it'll tend to hold it together, and thus, slow it down. Most of the matter, it turns out, is this weird dark matter, which we don't understand, but that's what's responsible for the deceleration. If you're going to make it go faster, you need something much weirder that pushes outward, that has repulsive force. This, we believe, actually exists. This, we label dark energy. And so, the question of, "is it accelerating or is it decelerating," is basically a question of how much dark energy is there versus how much matter is there, because the more--if you have more of this than this, then it will accelerate and vice versa. And what we have discovered by supernovae observations with redshifts of greater than 0.3, and by now, out to about a redshift of 1, or so, demonstrate that--well, what exactly does this say? Let's go slowly. In the past, the Universe was expanding more slowly than it is now, and therefore--those three dots are the mathematical symbol for therefore. Therefore, the Universe is accelerating, and therefore, there's more dark energy than there is matter.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page1 / 10

transcript22 -...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online