Frontiers and Controversies in Astrophysics: Lecture 23 Transcript
April 24, 2007
<< back
Professor Charles Bailyn:
We've been talking about the Type I
a
Supernovae and the data that they provide
about the expansion and, as it turns out, acceleration of the Universe. And so, one way to summarize all that
information is that what we have found out--we now know that the Universe is accelerating, not just
expanding, but accelerating. And that acceleration comes about because of some kind of dark energy--or to
turn it around, the label we give to whatever is calling that is dark energy. And this sometimes gets
summarized by this quantity, which is the energy density of the dark energy relative to the critical density of
the Universe. And the fact that it's accelerating means that this quantity must be greater than this other
quantity, the density of matter, because the matter tends to pull things together.
And so, we know not only that it's accelerating, we know something about how much it is accelerating, and
that tells us how much bigger the dark energy density is than the matter density. And we kind of know by
how much. We kind of know how much bigger this is than the dark matter density.
But somebody actually asked the question that, you know, I keep saying, well, this is like 3/4, and this is like
1/4. If you add a bunch of matter, couldn't you just add a bunch of dark energy also, and end up with the same
amount of acceleration? So, a comparable Universe. And the answer is, yes, you could. There's nothing in the
supernova data that prohibits this from being .5 and this from being 1, as long as this is sufficiently greater
than that by the amount necessary to give rise to the observed acceleration.
And so, if you plot these two quantities against each other--so, here's, kind of, 0, 0. Actually, this can be
negative, but let's not go there.
1, 1. What you find out is that there's a kind of allowed region that sort of looks like this, allowed by the
supernova data. Notice, this is--I'm assuming throughout that the dark energy really is the Cosmological
Constant. I'm not thinking about Big Rip scenarios at the moment, because that would add a third dimension
to this plot, and I don't want to do that just yet. So, this is all assuming that dark energy is the Cosmological
Constant. But that's certainly a place to start. There's no reason not to do that.
And so, I've been kind of consistently claiming, as we've been talking about the course, that the real answer is
somewhere like here. Yeah? That it's about .3 on the matter side, .25 and about 3/4, 2/3, 3/4 on the dark
energy side. But, in fact, you could go--as far as the supernova care, you could have no matter at all and just a
little dark energy, or you could have a lot of matter and a huge amount of dark energy. And you'd get the
amount of acceleration, and therefore, satisfy the observational constraints.