This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: 18-1 CHAPTER 18 SPOILAGE, REWORK, AND SCRAP 18-1Managers have found that improved quality and intolerance for high spoilage have lowered overall costs and increased sales. 18-2Spoilageunits of production that do not meet the standards required by customers for good units and that are discarded or sold at reduced prices. Reworkunits of production that do not meet the specifications required by customers but which are subsequently repaired and sold as good finished units. Scrapresidual material that results from manufacturing a product. It has low total sales value compared to the total sales value of the product. 18-3No. Normal spoilage is spoilage inherent in a particular production process that arises even under efficient operating conditions. 18-4Abnormal spoilage is spoilage that is not inherent in a particular production process and would not arise under efficient operating conditions. Costs of abnormal spoilage are lost costs, measures of inefficiency that should be written off directly as losses for the accounting period. 18-5Management effort can affect the spoilage rate. Many companies are relentlessly reducing their rates of normal spoilage, spurred on by competitors who, likewise, are continuously reducing costs. 18-6 Normal spoilage typically is expressed as a percentage of good units passing the inspection point. Given actual spoiled units, we infer abnormal spoilage as follows: Abnormal spoilage = Actual spoilage Normal spoilage. 18-7No. Accounting for spoiled goods deals with cost assignment, rather than with cost incurrence, because the existence of spoiled goods does not involve any additional cost beyond the amount already incurred. 18-8Yes. Normal spoilage rates should be computed from the good output or from the normalinput, not the totalinput. Normal spoilage is a given percentage of a certain output base. This base should never include abnormal spoilage, which is included in total input. Abnormal spoilage does not vary in direct proportion to units produced, and to include it would cause the normal spoilage count to fluctuate irregularly and not vary in direct proportion to the output base. 18-9Yes, the point of inspection is the key to the assignment of spoilage costs. Normal spoilage costs do not attach solely to units transferred out. Thus, if units in ending work in process have passed inspection, they should have normal spoilage costs added to them. 18-10No. If abnormal spoilage is detected at a different point in the production cycle than normal spoilage, then unit costs would differ. If, however normal and abnormal spoilage are detected at the same point in the production cycle, their unit costs would be the same. 18-2 18-11No. In process costing, spoilage costs are not assigned to that job....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 02/06/2012 for the course FIN 201 taught by Professor Dr.ada during the Summer '08 term at Alfred University.
- Summer '08