This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: The Mean Value Theorem and the Extended Mean Value Theorem Willard Miller September 21, 2006 0.1 The MVT Recall the Extreme Value Theorem (EVT) from class: If the function f is defined and continuous on a closed bounded interval [ a, b ] then there is some point c [ a, b ] where it takes on its maximum value M = f ( c ) and some point d [ a, b ] where it takes on its minimum value m = f ( d ). Thus M = f ( c ) f ( x ) f ( d ) = m for all x [ a, b ]. Theorem 1 Fermats Theorem. (Not his last one but a very useful observa tion that is easy to prove.) Suppose the function f is defined and continuous on a closed bounded interval [ a, b ] and takes on an extreme value (either its maximum M or its minimum m ) at an interior point c of the interval, so a < c < b . If the derivative f ( c ) exists, then f ( c ) = 0 . PROOF: To be definite, we assume that f ( c ) = M . (The proof for the case f ( c ) = m is virtually the same.) By definition f ( c ) = lim x f ( c + x ) f ( c ) x . (1) Since f ( c ) = M is a maximum, it follows that for x > 0 we have f ( c + x ) f ( c ) x , 1 since the numerator is nonpositive and the denominator is positive. On the other hand, for x < 0 we have f ( c + x ) f ( c ) x , since the numerator is nonpositive and the denominator is negative. However by assumption the limit (1) exists and the same value is obtained as x through postitive or negative values. Thus we must have f ( c ) = 0. Q.E.D....
View
Full
Document
This note was uploaded on 02/07/2012 for the course MATH 1271 taught by Professor Ming during the Fall '08 term at Minnesota.
 Fall '08
 MING
 Calculus, Mean Value Theorem

Click to edit the document details