midterm+2+answers - Department of Economics University of...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Department of Economics Spring 2011 University of California Prof. Woroch Economics 140 : 2 ND MIDTERM ANSWER SHEET Note: There were versions of the exam that differed in terms of the order of questions and the numerical values. Below are suggested answers for one version, but with notes about answers to other versions. I. EVALUATE ECONOMETRIC RESEARCH 1. “To understand the economic determinants of alcohol consumption, I estimated a log-log regression of consumption of alcoholic beverages reported to me by 1,000 adults in California on the average price of alcohol in their home town and their reported annual personal income. All data are from 2010. I know that individuals typically err in reporting their income, and I also believe they will err in reporting their true alcohol consumption. If they randomly err in reporting both values, which I am willing to assume, I would nevertheless expect that my estimate of the income elasticity of demand will be biased. Specifically, I expect it will show excessive elasticity relative to the true value.” Answer: This is a case of error in measurement of both the dependent variable and one of the independent variables. Assuming that the population regression has a positive coefficient on income (i.e., alcoholic beverages is a “normal good”), then we would expect the estimated elasticity will be too small because measurement error in an explanatory variable biases that variable’s coefficient towards zero. The measurement error in the dependent variable, i.e., purchase of alcoholic beverages, will not cause a bias, but it will increase the standard error of the regression relative to case where purchases are accurately measured, e.g., using grocery store scanner data linked to a consumer. Some people assumed alcoholic beverages to be inferior goods (negative coefficient on income), this is less intuitive, but we accepted this assumption as well: Even if we think that richer people tend to drink less alcohol in quantity , they still might spend more on it in dollar terms (as they tend to buy more expensive drinks – e.g. cognac instead of beer) and consumption is measured in dollar terms. In this case, the measurement error in income will bias the elasticity upward, but that still means a flatter than true regression line, and hence smaller elasticity. 2. “I wanted to model the effect of education on the earnings of U.S. workers. To do so, using data from the Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey in 2000, I ran a multivariate linear regression of workers’ hourly earnings on their age and gender, as well as their level of educational attainment. Unconvinced that these demographic variables fully explained a worker’s earnings, I ran a second regression which included dummy variables for the state in which workers reside. But, not wanting to fall in the “dummy variable trap,” I excluded one state, Alabama, leaving 49 others. Finally, recognizing that labor market conditions outside the individual’s control affect earnings, I ran a third regression
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 02/02/2012 for the course ECON 140 taught by Professor Duncan during the Spring '08 term at Berkeley.

Page1 / 5

midterm+2+answers - Department of Economics University of...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online