Dr. Hackney STA Solutions pg 160

# Dr. Hackney STA Solutions pg 160 - Second Edition 10-3 and...

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Second Edition 10-3 and for t = 1 ARE n ^ n-1 n-1 n ^ n ^ , e- = ( - 1)e- n n-1 n-1 n n 2 n-1 n n . 1 + log Since [(n - 1)/n]n e-1 as n , both of these AREs are equal to 1 in the limit. ^ d. For these data, n = 15, Xi = y = 104 and the MLE of is = X = 6.9333. The estimates are MLE UMVUE P (X = 0) .000975 .000765 P (X = 1) .006758 .005684 10.11 a. It is easiest to use the Mathematica code in Example A.0.7. The second derivative of the log likelihood is 2 log 2 1 x-1+/ e-x/ [/] / = 1 (/), 2 where (z) = (z)/(z) is the digamma function. b. Estimation of does not affect the calculation. c. For = known, the MOM estimate of is x/. The MLE comes from differentiating the log likelihood d set -n log - xi / = 0 = x/. d i d. The MOM estimate of comes from solving 1 n xi = and i 1 n x2 = 2 + , i i ~ ^ x which yields = 2 /. The approximate variance is quite a pain to calculate. Start from 1 2 , E^ 2 , Var^ 2 3 , n n where we used Exercise 5.8(b) for the variance of 2 . Now using Example 5.5.27 and (and ^ ~ 3 3 . The ARE is then assuming the covariance is zero), we have Var n EX = , VarX = ^ ~ ARE(, ) = 3 3 / E - d2 l(, |X d 2 . Here is a small table of AREs. There are some entries that are less than one - this is due to using an approximation for the MOM variance. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 1.878 4.238 6.816 9.509 12.27 15.075 17.913 20.774 23.653 26.546 3 0.547 1.179 1.878 2.629 3.419 4.238 5.08 5.941 6.816 7.704 6 0.262 0.547 0.853 1.179 1.521 1.878 2.248 2.629 3.02 3.419 10 0.154 0.317 0.488 0.667 0.853 1.046 1.246 1.451 1.662 1.878 ...
View Full Document

## This note was uploaded on 02/03/2012 for the course STA 1014 taught by Professor Dr.hackney during the Spring '12 term at UNF.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online