16Financial Theory

16Financial Theory - Financial Theory

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Financial Theory: Lecture 16 Transcript October 29, 2009 << back Professor John Geanakoplos: We're now at the stage where we're considering the implications of uncertainty, so I hope that the subtlety, and surprise element of the class, will gradually pick up without increasing the difficulty. The complexity will pick up a little bit, but not the difficulty. It's just you'll have to keep a few more things in your head, but the mathematics isn't any harder. So we ended last time talking about default and inferring default probabilities, and so I just want to finish off that discussion. So suppose that at any stage of the tree, you know, lots of things can happen in the world. We're always going to model the uncertainty in the future by a tree with different things happening, and at each of these nodes people are going to have a discount rate. So maybe it'll be r equals 20 percent, and here r could equal 15 percent, something like that, and we want to add to this the possibility that there's default. So if we add the possibility of default, and these things keep going and maybe there are payoffs at the end or payoffs along the way. If at any point in the tree like this one we add a new possibility, which is the default possibility, so this happens--by the way, when do people default? They never default before they have to make a payment. So when do they default, exactly when they're supposed to make a payment. So suppose that this guy is going to default here when he's going to make a payment. At every possible scenario he would default there. So we've got a very simple model of default, so not a very realistic one where the guy defaults in all of these following scenarios. So something's just bad. Once he's gotten here you know that he's not going to make the payment the next period. We further assume that not only does he default there, but he defaults on everything thereafter. So the payoff is just going to be 0 here. So this is going to be--originally we had probabilities p 1 , p 2 , p 3 , let's say for the probabilities, now we're going to have probabilities d for default and then 1 - d times all of these, right? So essentially what have we done? We've simply replaced in our calculation of payoffs and present values, we've simply replaced these possibilities with probability p 1 , p 2 , p 3 . We added another possibility, but the payoffs are 0 here. Nothing's going to happen from then on except 0, and we said that happened with probability d, which means presumably, all of these have to be scaled down by that so they still add up to 1. So essentially the point I'm trying to make is that default that leads to 0 payoffs thereafter is just like discounting more. Why is that? Because whatever calculation you did for the value here of what the bond could possibly be worth there is--it's all the same numbers as there were before except we've multiplied it by 1 - d, so it's the same thing. So instead of going 1 over 1 + r times future payoffs, that's no default value, so that times future payoffs. Now we've got default value under this special kind of default is going to be 1 - d times 1 over 1 + r
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 02/08/2012 for the course ECON 251 taught by Professor Geanakoplos,john during the Fall '09 term at Yale.

Page1 / 19

16Financial Theory - Financial Theory

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online