media systems 2

media systems 2 - The First Amendment and Government...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: The First Amendment and Government Regulations Freedom of the Press-The First Amendment allegedly prohibits federal regulation of speech and press, yet the Communications Act of 1934 and Telecommunications Acts of 1996 have imposed federal regulations.-Publishers of newspapers own the press and paper. Broadcasters use the broadcasting spectrum which is owned by the public. (renting the right to read someone else’s property) Two Court Cases- Red Lion Decision (1969)- The Supreme Court ruled that the FCC’s rule that entitled persons attacked on a broadcast media to reply to their attackers was legal and just.- Tornillo Decision(1974)- The Supreme Court overthrew a Florida law which gave political candidates the right to reply to printed attacks. Regulated Fairness- The Fairness Doctrine- in effect until 1987. Upheld by Red Lion Decision. - Personal Attack Rule- stations have a duty to inform individuals or groups of personal attacks- Political Editorial Rule- A candidate must be given a chance to response when a licensee (station) endorses an opponent.-Both rules repealed in 2000. Exceptions to the Rules-FCC mandates access for ideas of public importance only!- Fairness dealt with the overall programming of the station, not just one issue.-*Equal Times Doesn’t Mean Equal Time* Public’s Right to Know vs. Personal Privacy- NY Times vs. Sullivan (1964)- political from south that said NY Times had libeled him, Times won because has to prove with “deliberate malice”. - Hustler Magazine vs. Falwell (1988)- Falwell, televangelist with followers, sued in Virginia---won first level. (fake advertisement). Hustler Magazine’s owner Flint won because: “Proof of emotional distress (even with) bad motive” can’t protect public figures from satirical assaults, no matter how ‘outrageous’”. Free Press vs. Fair Trial-What happens when two amendments clash? What takes precedent: the first amendment rights to a free press and free speech or the constitutional rights to a fair trial?-New York State vs. Steinberg (1988)- lawyer in NY, coke fiend and beaten family. Not convicted of murder, manslaughter: tainted jurors due to press coverage-State of California vs. OJ SImpson (1995)- trial on tv: you don’t know! Extremely important trial and basically turned into a soap opera: press coverage can affect ability to get fair trial Legislative Decisions- Radio Act of 1927-Federal Radio Commission (FRC)-Communications Act of 1934-Federal Communications Commission (FCC)-Telecommunications Act of 1996-”Scarcity Factor” deals with the fact that the amount of space and number of slots available is scares, over-the-air radio/tv, The FCC-Five (5) Members-Only (3) can be from the same party-”Serve the public interest, convenience and necessity” There is no definition of public interest*-Used for political purposes-FCC vs. Pacifica Foundation-George Carlins’ Seven Dirty Words-”Time of Day” *Supreme Court ruled for FCC not on content but on “time of day”...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 02/06/2012 for the course COMM 189 taught by Professor Miller during the Fall '08 term at Rutgers.

Page1 / 13

media systems 2 - The First Amendment and Government...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online