Writing.Research+Assignment+FULL+DESCRIPTION[1]

Writing.Research+Assignment+FULL+DESCRIPTION[1] -...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Writing/Research Assignment DUE in class on Monday, April 11 th Please note that this description of the assignment supersedes the one in the syllabus. Briefs by the parties can be found at: www.supremecourtus.gov http://www.americanbar.org/publications/preview_hom e/alphabetical.html Cases: In the book: Brown v. Board of Ed UC Regents v. Bakke Frontiero v. Richardson San Antonio v. Rodriguez Additional cases: Snyder v. Phelps Walmart Stores v. Dukes Bond v. United States Skinner v. Switzer Microsoft v. i4i Limited Partnership Three components : Very brief summary of the legal question (one paragraph) List all of the cases in which: (Be sure to label each of your five lists.) 1. The U.S. Gov’t/Solicitor General was a party to the case. 2. The U.S. Gov’t/Solicitor General filed an amicus brief. 3. A state (attorney general/ solicitor general; or a local governmental unit) a party to the case. 4. A state (attorney general/ solicitor general; or a local governmental unit)
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 02/06/2012 for the course POLISCI 106 taught by Professor Levine during the Fall '07 term at Rutgers.

Page1 / 3

Writing.Research+Assignment+FULL+DESCRIPTION[1] -...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online