Assessment Forms-Group Project

Assessment Forms-Group Project - l “mum”. ‘ w;...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–4. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Background image of page 2
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Background image of page 4
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: l “mum”. ‘ w; “M”... mm“... Mm...” Madman—ma... c.-:.l,...__...m.m..wm..-.-._ml. . m. SMALL GROUP PRESENTATION Group Evaluation Form Speaker: Time Limit: Topic: Situation/audience: ~¥ INTRODUCTION: 5 1. Captured attention 5. Previewed main points 2. Stated thesis 6. Provided transition to body : 3. Related topic to audience ' 7. Other comments: 3 4. ' Established credibility ‘ B O D Y : 1. Organized main points clearly and logically 2. Included transitions between main points i 4. Used accurate, relevant and timely supporting materials in sufficient quantity 5. Cited sources accurately in speech 6. Used relevant, professional visual aids that enhanced audience understanding 7. Used visual aids appropriately 8. Used an oral language style appropriate to topic and audience 3 9. Other comments: ; C O N C L U S I O N : '1. Provided transition to conclusion 2. Restated thesis 3. Summarized main points I 4. Ended with a memorable final thought (clincher) 5. Other comments: QUESTION AND ANSWER SECTION: i 1. __Rephrased questions ' 4. Q&A was well organized and professional 2. Answered questions clearly and completely 5. Other comments: g 3. Answered questions succinctly j i OVERALL GROUP ASSESSMENT: 1. Project demonstrated creativity . 2. Accomplishment of group persuasive and informative goals 3. Presentation demonstrated group cohesiveness 4. Transitioning from one speaker to another was smooth 5. Other comments: EVALUATION OF PROPOSAL 1. Proposal clearly identified and defined campus issue! problem 2. Proposal presented a clear plan for dealing with issue j 3. Proposal presented a practical solution 4. Other comments: 415 749554199393!" , 10. List one area for improvement. Name: Group being evaluated: COMMITTEE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE This is the form you use to evaluate another group's presentation. Each group is required to act as the committee during one other group’s presentation. Please fill out this form after the group has completed their presentation and the question and answer period. Did the group grab and maintain your interest? Did the group adequately define the problem? ' Is this problem important to our community? Did the group present a practical solution to the problem? Did the group present compelling evidence to support this presentation? Did the group handle questions effectively? The visual aids were professional and presented effectively? 8. Rate the overall effectiveness of the presentation. very poor average excellent g l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 9. List two strengths in the presentation. 41? Group: SMALL GROUP PRESENTATION Individual Evaluation Form Name: Individual Delivery (15 points): 1. Used adequate and inclusive eye contact (extemporaneous delivery) 2. Used effectivevocal delivery (appropriate rate and volume, clear articulation, varied inflection, and no vocal fillers) 3. Used effective physical delivery (posture, gestures, movement) 4. Actively engaged during group presentation 5. COmments: Total points Individual Contribution to the Group Presentation (10 points): (This score is based on what your group members said you did in preparation for the presentation.) 1. Comments: Total points Committee Member Responsibilities (10 points): 1. Asked well-informed questions. : 2. Attentive during the presentation. 3. Provided honest, thorough feedback on the group critique form. Total points ? Group Evaluation Questionnaire (5 points) Answered the questions thoroughly and completely. { Total points 3 Individual Score Total Project Score : Individual Delivery Individual Score 7 Individual Contribution Group Score 3 Committee Member Total Score ‘ Group Questionnaire Total 419 Name: % Group: GROUP EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE Group Member Name: ? How many meetings did this member attend? How many did they miss? What role did this group member play? Not at all Extremely well How productive was this group member? 1 2 - 3 4 5 _ Not at all Extremely well How well did they work with others? 1 2 3 4 5 Group Member Name: How many meetings did this member attend? How many did they miss? What role did this group member play? Not at all Extremely well How productive was this group member? 1 2 3 4 5 Not well Extremely well How well did they work with others? 1 2 3 4 5 Group Member Name: How many meetings did this member attend? How many did they miss? What role did this group member play? v Not at all Extremely well How productive was this group member? 1 2 3 4 5 _ Not well Extremely well How well did they work with others? 1 2 3 4 5 ...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 02/06/2012 for the course COMM 217 taught by Professor Courtneyscherr during the Fall '11 term at Purdue University-West Lafayette.

Page1 / 4

Assessment Forms-Group Project - l “mum”. ‘ w;...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 4. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online