148-177524_gender_chapter_myers_1d2

148-177524_gender_chapter_myers_1d2 - Boys and girls...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Boys and girls achievement: what’s really happening? Tim Oates Group Director, Assessment Research and Development, Cambridge Assessment This chapter is designed to dispel some contemporary myths regarding the relative performance of boys and girls in schooling 5-19. It reproduces the key findings from a presentation to DfES staff and leading educationalists, given by the author and Sylvia Green, both of Cambridge Assessment. There is a profound need to dispel simplistic representation of gendered achievement in education and training, and in particular, myths around ‘boys underachievement’. Without evidence-driven understanding, there is a grave risk of misunderstanding the real standing of males and females in society as a whole, and of formulating highly defective public policy. Nowhere is this risk more great than in the realm of ‘boy friendly learning’. Media attention on ‘underperforming boys’ has paid little attention to important subtleties in the nature of the problem, and in the findings from research. In his influential 2001 pamphlet, John Marks failed to highlight that both boys and girls have improved, but boys have improved less (rather than boys’ performance getting worse in absolute terms) (Marks J, 2001). It’s not all boys at all levels/ages who are underperforming. There is a complex mix of developmental, educational and social phenomena behind the differences in boys’ and girls’ relative performance. There are no simple explanations for the gender gap; many factors have an influence: learning preferences deriving from developmental distinctions between boys and girls, pupil grouping in schools, assessment techniques, the curriculum, teaching styles, teacher expectations, role models, and the way teachers reward and discipline. Ofsted have evidence of gendered behaviour by teachers – including setting, attention-management, subject choice advice, and decisions about entry to tiered papers….and more…(Ofsted 2003). Not least amongst these factors is gender-stereotypical peer group pressure amongst boys which reinforces low levels of engagement with learning (Warrington M, Younger M. 2005). Dispelling myths 1: it’s a new problem. The ‘gender gap’ is not a new problem; if raw scores in the 11+ had been used to determine selection, then grammar schools in the 50s and 60s would have been populated almost exclusively by girls. Likewise, the historical figures for O level achievement in the 1960s and 70s show a gap in gender achievement, roughly 5% difference in pass rate, 10% in some subjects (eg languages) (Murphy R. 1980). Dispelling myths 2: it’s all about education Actually it’s all about development, including pre-natal development. It all starts much earlier than people think. Babies are actively processing speech before birth; they can recognise a story that they have heard while still in the womb. (DeCasper, A. J. and Spence, M. J. 1986). Early experiences affect cognitive development in a profound way;
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 13

148-177524_gender_chapter_myers_1d2 - Boys and girls...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online