ActSc 371_Assignment 2

ActSc 371_Assignment 2 - ActSc 371 F2011 Assignment Two...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
ActSc 371 – F2011 - Assignment Two Instructor: Dr. Lysa Porth Part 1: Multiple Choice (MC) Possible Marks 33 Student Score ID Number: ________________________________ Last Name:_________________________________ First Name:______________________________ This assignment is due on November 2, 2011, at the beginning of class (i.e. 2:30 pm in MC2066). This is an individual assignment. All questions are multiple choice. You do not need to show your work, simply put the answer. No late assignments will be accepted. If you are not able to hand in your assignment during class time, please ensure that you hand it in prior to. It is acceptable to slide your completed assignment under my office door: M3: 3128. This assignment is worth a total of 10 marks, weighted to 7.5% of your final grade. 1. “It is reasonable that investors would set interest rates so that the forward rate from year 3 to 4 would equal the one year spot rate in place 3 years from today.” This is an illustration of the: (2 marks) A) Pure Forward rate hypothesis. B) Augmented Expectation Hypothesis. C) Segmented Market Preference Hypothesis D) Liquidity-Preference Hypothesis. E)
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 02/08/2012 for the course ACTSC 371 taught by Professor Wood during the Fall '08 term at Waterloo.

Page1 / 3

ActSc 371_Assignment 2 - ActSc 371 F2011 Assignment Two...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online