Econ+102+lecture+22%2C+4-3-12+-+The+pro-trade+argument copy

Econ+102+lecture+22%2C+4-3-12+-+The+pro-trade+argument copy...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–10. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Lecture 22: Trade 1 –  The argument in favor of trade Econ 102, Winter 2012 4/3/2012 1 Required reading : Ch 5: pp. 117 – 127 Recommended reading : Salvatore, Chs 3 & 4 (on CTools)
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Outline 1. A review of macro choice 2. The Ricardian argument 3. Sources of comparative advantage 4/3/2012 2
Background image of page 2
Macroeconomic choice, redux Today, we start to investigate that neglected tail of our national income identity, NX = (EX – IM) Why would IM or EX differ from zero? I.e., why trade? Should we trade? Is trade always good? Does everyone agree with this? If some trade is “bad”, what policies can we use to affect our trade patterns? Why would IM not equal EX? What are the costs and benefits of the resulting trade deficit/surplus? 4/3/2012 3
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Macroeconomic choice, redux Recall our model of macroeconomic production of specific goods, the PPF. To draw a PPF of a specific economy, we must know the resource stock and the productive technology of that economy. To keep things simple today, we’ll assume a linear production technology. Can describe production (with a linear technology and only one input, labor (L)) like so: - Production of 1 unit of peppers takes 3 L - Production of 1 unit of beef, takes 5 L 4/3/2012 4 technology resources
Background image of page 4
Macroeconomic choice, redux How does an economy make a productive choice in autarky (in isolation, with no trade)? Either via planning or markets A fully-informed, benevolent social planner makes the same welfare-maximizing choice as do competitive markets Tangency of PPF and community indifference curves 4/3/2012 5
Background image of page 5

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Macroeconomic choice, redux beef peppers 6
Background image of page 6
Macroeconomic choice, redux There is an intra-country market for each good, so that the relative domestic price of each good (partially) determines the level of output Recall the rule of optimal production from macro choice: slope(PFF) = - price ratio slope(PPF) = Which holds in autarky as long as both goods are produced In the linear setup, the slope of the PPF is constant. 4/3/2012 7 pepper beef P P P P - = - good axis y axis x
Background image of page 7

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Macroeconomic choice, redux beef peppers In absolute value: 1. Slope(PPF) = - Pbeef/Ppepper  PPF and price line identical 3. Slope(PPF) > - Pbeef/Ppepper only peppers produced 5. Slope(PPF) < 8
Background image of page 8
Macroeconomic choice, redux In Argentina in autarky To get one more beef, need 5 units of labor. This 5 labor could produce 5/3 = 1.66 peppers.
Background image of page 9

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 10
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 02/10/2012 for the course ECON 102 taught by Professor Rossana during the Winter '08 term at University of Michigan.

Page1 / 32

Econ+102+lecture+22%2C+4-3-12+-+The+pro-trade+argument copy...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 10. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online