hwk6final

hwk6final - ENGR 126 Fall 2008 MEA 1 Purdue Paper Plane...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
ENGR 126 – Fall 2008 HOMEWORK 6 MEA 1 Purdue Paper Plane Challenge For Homework 6, you will complete MEA 1. This requires: 1. Team completion of Team Final (3 rd ) Draft 2. Team completion of Team Critique of MEA ‘Critique by Peer’ (TCMCP) 3. Individual completion of the Individual MEA Peer Critique Reflection 1. MEA 1 – Team Final (3 rd ) Draft This problem is to be completed by your entire team You will use the feedback provided by your peers to inform continued development of your team’s solution to MEA 1 completed in Homework 3. You will have access to the Peer Critiques on the MEA 1 – Team Final (3 rd ) Draft link on the WebForms page at: https://engineering.purdue.edu/ENE/WebformsFor/AvailableFor/ENGR126 When you open the MEA 1 – Team Final (3rd) Draft link, you should see 3-4 Peer Critiques. At this time, your project supervisor (Mandi Conner) would like your team to revise your MEA 1 Team Draft 2 procedure(s) and provide documentation on the revisions (see below). To: Purdue Engineering Team From: Mandi Conner; Education Chair, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Subject: Purdue Paper Airplane Competition I would again like your team to revise and finalize your methods for determining winners of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) Paper Airplane Competitions. Recall that the competition involves both a straight throw and a boomerang throw. A third set of sample data from past years is provided to test your procedure(s). When revising your procedure(s), consider the feedback that has been provided to you. Please document all revisions that you team makes to your procedure(s). Write a memo to my attention that includes only your revised procedure(s). In your memo include methods for how to determine winners for the categories of Most Accurate, Best Floater, Best Boomerang, and Best Overall. Your team does not have to use all the measurements, but you do have to be able to justify your methods. Within the procedure, be sure to clearly state the reason for each step, heuristic (i.e. rule), or consideration in your procedure. Use your procedure and Sample Data Sets 2 and 3 provided to determine the winners in each category. State the winners (for Sample Data Set 2 and 3) with quantitative results in your memo (that is, treat each set of sample data as a separate competition. Care needs to be taken to distinguish the results of these two data sets. So, Team 1 from Data Set 2 should be tagged Team 1-DS2, and Team 1 from Data Set 3 should be tagged Team 1-DS3. Recall that the client is looking for a share-able, re-usable, and modifiable procedure that is easy to use, understand, and modify. To prepare to make revisions, your team should: Review the original memo from the client and subsequent documentation (Lab 3 & Homework 3)
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
ENGR 126 – Fall 2008 HOMEWORK 6 Review your team’s first and second response to the client Review the feedback provided by your TA and your peers, paying close attention to (1) the
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 5

hwk6final - ENGR 126 Fall 2008 MEA 1 Purdue Paper Plane...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online