ch15sol - CHAPTER 15 ALLOCATION OF SUPPORT DEPARTMENT...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: CHAPTER 15 ALLOCATION OF SUPPORT DEPARTMENT COSTS, COMMON COSTS, AND REVENUES 15-1 The single-rate cost-allocation method makes no distinction between fixed costs and variable costs in the cost pool. It allocates costs in each cost pool to cost objects using the same rate per unit of the single allocation base. The dual-rate cost-allocation method classifies costs in each cost pool into two poolsa variable-cost pool and a fixed-cost poolwith each pool using a different cost-allocation base. 15.2 The dual-rate method provides information to division managers about cost behavior. Knowing how fixed costs and variable costs behave differently is useful in decision making. 15.3 Budgeted cost rates motivate the manager of the supplier department to improve efficiency because the supplier department bears the risk of any unfavorable cost variances. 15-4 Examples of bases used to allocate support department cost pools to operating departments include the number of employees, square feet of space, number of hours, and machine-hours. 15-5 The use of budgeted indirect cost allocation rates rather than actual indirect rates has several attractive features to the manager of a user department: a. the user knows the costs in advance and can factor them into ongoing operating choices, and b. inefficiencies at the department providing the service do not affect the costs allocated to the user department. 15.6 Disagree. Allocating costs on "the basis of estimated long-run use by user department managers" means department managers can lower their cost allocations by deliberately underestimating their long-run use (assuming all other managers do not similarly underestimate their usage). 15-7 The three methods differ in how they recognize reciprocal services among support departments: a. The direct allocation method ignores any services rendered by one support department to another; it allocates each support departments costs directly to the operating departments. b. The step-down allocation method allows for partial recognition of services rendered by support departments to other support departments. c. The reciprocal allocation method allocates costs by explicitly including the mutual services provided among all support departments. 15-8 The reciprocal method is theoretically the most defensible method because it explicitly recognizes the mutual services provided among all departments, irrespective of whether those departments are operating or support departments. 15-1 15-9 The stand-alone cost-allocation method uses information pertaining to each user of a cost object as a separate entity to determine the cost-allocation weights. The incremental cost-allocation method ranks the individual users of a cost object in the order of users most responsible for the common costs and then uses this ranking to allocate costs among those users. The first-ranked user of the cost object is the primary user and is allocated costs up to the costs of the primary user as a stand-alone user. The second-ranked user is the first costs up to the costs of the primary user as a stand-alone user....
View Full Document

This document was uploaded on 02/11/2012.

Page1 / 43

ch15sol - CHAPTER 15 ALLOCATION OF SUPPORT DEPARTMENT...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online