law class wk5 paper

law class wk5 paper - Negligent Tort BUS 670 Barry Morinaka...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Negligent Tort BUS 670 Barry Morinaka October 31, 2011 Bridget Hall
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Tort law is one of the major areas in our legal system today. A tort as defined by Merriam-Webster is “a wrongful acts other than a breach of contract for which relief may be obtained in the form of damages or an injunction” (Merriam-webster.com, 2011). In most cases, a plaintiff seeks some kind of monetary damages. There is high speculation relating to this law in question all over the media today, a high profile case concerning the physician of Michael Jackson. The law is imposing that this physician had a standard of care he had to adhere by and there was a breach of this duty. As a physician alone, this individual had a set of guidelines or regulations he had to follow but the negligence to do so results in the consequences he faces today. The law now has to decide which, if not both, intentional and negligent torts to charge this physician with and is crucial in this case. “The elements of a negligence claim are: (1) that the defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff; (2) that the defendant committed a breach of
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 02/12/2012 for the course LAW 670 taught by Professor Bmorinaka during the Winter '11 term at Ashford University.

Page1 / 4

law class wk5 paper - Negligent Tort BUS 670 Barry Morinaka...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online