Spatial Correlation Plus

# Spatial Correlation Plus - Spatial Autocorrelation Nilupa...

This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

Spatial Autocorrelation Nilupa Gunaratna, Yali Liu, Junyong Park 1. Definition Observations made at different locations may not be independent. For example, measurements made at nearby locations may be closer in value than measurements made at locations farther apart. This phenomenon is called spatial autocorrelation. Spatial autocorrelation measures the correlation of a variable with itself through space. Spatial autocorrelation can be positive or negative. Positive spatial autocorrelation occurs when similar values occur near one another. Negative spatial autocorrelation occurs when dissimilar values occur near one another. 2. Weight Matrix To assess spatial autocorrelation, one first needs to define what is meant by two observations being close together, i.e., a distance measure must be determined. These distances are presented in weight matrix, which defines the relationships between locations where measurements were made. If data are collected at n locations, then the weight matrix will be n n × with zeroes on the diagonal. The weight matrix can be specified in many ways: The weight for any two different locations is a constant. All observations within a specified distance have a fixed weight. K nearest neighbors have a fixed weight, and all others are zero. Weight is proportional to inverse distance, inverse distance squared, or inverse distance up to a specified distance. Other weight matrices are possible. The weight matrix is often row-standardized, i.e., all the weights in a row sum to one. Note that the actual values in the weight matrix are up to the researcher. 3. Measures of Spatial Autocorrelation A. Moran's I Moran's I (Moran 1950) tests for global spatial autocorrelation for continuous data. It is based on cross-products of the deviations from the mean and is calculated for n observations on a variable x at locations i , j as: 1

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
2 0 ( )( ) ( ) ij i j i j i i w x x x x n I S x x - - = - ∑∑ , where x is the mean of the x variable, ij w are the elements of the weight matrix, and 0 S is the sum of the elements of the weight matrix: 0 ij i j S w = ∑∑ . Moran’s I is similar but not equivalent to a correlation coefficient. It varies from -1 to +1. In the absence of autocorrelation and regardless of the specified weight matrix, the expectation of Moran’s I statistic is 1/( 1) n - - , which tends to zero as the sample size increases. For a row-standardized spatial weight matrix, the normalizing factor 0 S equals n (since each row sums to 1), and the statistic simplifies to a ratio of a spatial cross product to a variance. A Moran’s I coefficient larger than 1/( 1) n - - indicates positive spatial autocorrelation, and a Moran’s I less than 1/( 1) n - - indicates negative spatial autocorrelation. The variance is: where B. Geary's C Geary’s C statistic (Geary 1954) is based on the deviations in responses of each observation with one another: 2 2 0 ( ) 1 2 ( ) ij i j i j i i w x x n C S x x - - = - ∑∑ . Geary’s C ranges from 0 (maximal positive autocorrelation) to a positive value for high
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

## This note was uploaded on 02/15/2012 for the course GEO 6938 taught by Professor Staff during the Summer '08 term at University of Florida.

### Page1 / 15

Spatial Correlation Plus - Spatial Autocorrelation Nilupa...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online