This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: improvements to the land. A plaintiff seeking to rely on this must show partial payment and either entrance onto the land or physical improvements on it. Strongest Argument Briggs: We only made an oral agreement which are not valid contracts. Therefore the Sacketts have to be evicted from the house. Sackett: We had an oral agreement but even though it wasnt written there is an exception to the rule. Since we have been making payments on the house we can enforce the oral contract that we made. Who You think should win? I think that the Sacketts should win because even though the agreement was oral, it can be enforced if they paid part of the purchase price which they did. They agreed to pay the future payments on the mortgage which is considered part of the purchase price. Is this result fair?...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 02/15/2012 for the course BLAW 1310 taught by Professor Hale during the Fall '11 term at Texas State.
- Fall '11