regrade nature v nurture

regrade nature v nurture - supplemented with good detailed...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Justin Kucera Psych 111 sec. 039 Reasoning for Re-grade on Nature vs. Nurture Paper After re-reading my paper, your comments on my paper, reviewing the general standards for grading papers, and reviewing the assignment, I respectfully disagree with my grade of a C+. My paper assessed every point that was outlined in the assignment. I have a conceptual definition, two operational definitions, evidence for nature and nurture, and a good assessment of that evidence. Not only do I just have these in my paper, but they are elaborated on in-depth and
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: supplemented with good detailed examples. My writing is mostly clear of grammatical errors and it flows well. The overall writing is higher than a C+, I believe. After reading the C portion of the general standards for grading, it is not clear to me why my paper fell into that category. I do not believe that the aspects of my paper fit in to the C range of a paper. I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience this causes you, and I thank you for your time....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 02/17/2012 for the course PSYCH 111 taught by Professor Schreier during the Fall '08 term at University of Michigan.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online