Peer Review for the capstone project

Peer Review for the capstone project -...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
BUS485 and MGT660   As you review one of your peers’ papers, please answer the questions here under! The feedback and comments should be only qualitative ones. As you do so, reflect on your own paper and rewrite it accordingly! For classes with odd number of students, two students will review one peer’s paper. Instructor and students might be asked to write a NDA (non disclosure agreement) so please add this in the online resource (if necessary). We ask all the students to disguise the name of the actual company. We and the instructors have to set up the CLCs so that the students and the peer reviewers use code names (as opposed to their own names). 1. Executive Summary (one to two pages maximum) Week 1: Instructor review 2. Environmental Analysis and Industry Analysis: Week 2: Peer review Read the Executive Summary of one of your peers. Has it been written with the right and specific audience in mind? Is the purpose of this piece of writing well defined? Is the central theme clear?
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 02/17/2012 for the course BUS 485 taught by Professor Dr.sheilaa.schmitz during the Spring '12 term at Grand Canyon.

Page1 / 3

Peer Review for the capstone project -...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online