(2007) Complete Study Guide

(2007) Complete Study Guide - COURSE OUTLINE: February 4:...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
C OURSE O UTLINE : February 4: Introduction: Elections and American Democracy First (introductory) lecture, 2/4. In this course, we will be concerned with questions such as these: 1. Why is it that the Supreme Court, which is the most insulated branch of government, changes its decisions as public opinion changes? 2. Why do Americans love their Congressmen and hate Congress? 3. Why, in 199?, did the public opinion want healthcare reform and yet it wasn’t passed, and in 200? it didn’t want the tax cut, and yet it was passed? International comparison : In the US, the legislative branch is unusually strong, the bureaucracy is permeable (there is not permanent governing class, where you need to be born into a certain social class or go to a certain university to become part of the bureaucracy), political parties are comparatively weak. American peculiarity and emphasis of this course – very frequent elections . Whence this American passion for elections? – Founders’ principal worry was tyranny. John Adams: “Where annual elections end, tyranny begins.” The number of elections has increased post-WW II: Up to the 1950s, elections to all levels of government would take place on a single date. Now this is no longer the case less time for policymaking, voter fatigue Weakening of the parties. Voters used to vote along party lines; party organizations would mobilize voters, endorse candidates. Now candidates are pretty much on their own - own staffs, own election campaigns, own money. In the early 70s primaries became the chief way of selecting candidates No other democracy in the world does this – in those countries (as in the US of old) it is party elites who decide which candidate to put forward. Because of primaries, each candidate now has two constituencies: his primary constituency, and his general election constituency (and at this point he or she needs to move away from the more extreme and partisan positions taken during the primary season) Media revolution. Rise of polling, which is now ubiquitous. Does it mean politicians are now more responsive to the people, or just better able to sell their proposals? There are a lot of critiques of the election-centered system: hard decisions are avoided, the system is ineffective, it encourages electoral posturing, there’s much room for exchanging money for privileges. But the system also has its benefits: US elected officials are some of the most responsive in the world. Fiorina and Peterson, Ch. 1
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Fiorina and Peterson Ch. 1: Democracy in the United States US democracy is driven more by electoral forces than other democracies the continual influences from such forces leads us to refer to the “ permanent campaign ”, i.e. all elected officials are always, at the same time, candidates running for reelection we have tons of elections: primary (parties chose nominee) and general (person gets elected into office) as well as initiatives (laws on the ballot due to citizens petitions),
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 02/21/2012 for the course GOV 97 taught by Professor Various during the Spring '11 term at Harvard.

Page1 / 97

(2007) Complete Study Guide - COURSE OUTLINE: February 4:...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online