Unformatted text preview: middle part approaches, I began to understand the main plot of the film as the argument starts to unveil on whether to declare the kid guilty or not guilty of murder. And so, what I acknowledge in the film as interesting is the flow of the story on how the main protagonist struggles to win the favor of his colleagues. Furthermore, as the deliberations unfold, the story quickly becomes a study of the jurors' complex personalities (from being wise, bright, and empathetic to arrogant, prejudiced and merciless), preconceptions, backgrounds and interactions. Without completing the film, I could still infer that the main protagonist was able to gain everyone’s favor of the ‘not guilty’ vote. Of course it wasn’t an easy task for him, but he surely did something significant in the eyes of the young man who was alleged of something he didn’t do in the first place....
View Full Document
- Summer '11
- Logic, Psychological manipulation, Single person, Jazzer Estrellanes