Peer Review _2

Peer Review _2 - Expos Spring 2012 Professor Hand Peer...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Expos Spring 2012 Professor Hand Peer Review #1 WRITER ___________________________ REVIEWER______________________ To the Reviewer: Each answer on this sheet must be specific . That means that each answer should refer to specific page numbers and specific sentences on those pages. You must give detailed answers. Answers that are vague or unhelpful (i.e., “she analyzes quotes well”) will be considered incomplete. DO NOT BE NICE. Peer review does not work when you tell your classmate that his or her paper is clear and easy to understand. No one’s writing is perfect, and we all need revision. Do not hesitate to tell your classmate about strengths in her writing, but spend the bulk of your time identifying weaknesses in her papers and making suggestions for revision. Be respectful. Peer review is not a short process. Anyone who finishes a peer review sheet in less than thirty minutes has not taken his job seriously and will be graded appropriately. Remember that peer review is graded. Remember that peer review is graded....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 02/21/2012 for the course ENGLISH 101 taught by Professor Smith during the Spring '07 term at Rutgers.

Page1 / 4

Peer Review _2 - Expos Spring 2012 Professor Hand Peer...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online