SHirchert-DraftingtheAnswer-Unit5.doc

SHirchert-DraftingtheAnswer-Unit5.doc - DEFENDANTS ANSWER...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
DEFENDANTS ANSWER TO THE COMPLAINT SHELLIE HIRCHERT UNIT 5 February 21, 2012 IN THE UNITES STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JUSTIN KING ) ) PLAINTIFF, )
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
VS ) CIVIL ACTION NO:_____________________ ) ANHEUSER BUSCH ) JUDGE: _____________________________ ) DEFENDANT ) DEFENDANT’S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT COMES NOW, ANHEUSER BUSCH, defendant in the above cause, and hereby answers the Plaintiff’s Complaint as follows: 1. As to paragraph 1 and 2, it is hereby ADMITTED. According to the police report, the information supplied for both plaintiff and defendant are correct. 2. As to paragraph 3, it is hereby DENIED. Defendant requires more information as to the monetary totals for this cause. 3. As to paragraphs 4, 5 and 6, it is hereby ADMITTED. Information is accurate as supplied on the police report. 4. As to paragraph 7, it is hereby DENIED IN PART. Defendant is unable to testify as to the manner in which the plaintiff operated his vehicle. Furthermore, defendant claims the
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 3

SHirchert-DraftingtheAnswer-Unit5.doc - DEFENDANTS ANSWER...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online