agBiofuels

agBiofuels - secure market, so even small farmers can...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Biofuels PRO’s o Renewable energy source o Theoretically carbon neutral o Could be sourced from crop residue o Could make use of marginal land (that is otherwise unproductive) CON’s o In reality does not only use marginal land o Uses a lot of land  decreases food security o Indirectly fuels deforestation* (e.g. in Brazil) as demand for land increases o Subsidies mean less profits for poor farmers Biofuels are a potential ‘win-win’ solution: o They address the oil crisis   providing renewable energy source o They address the climate crisis   theoretically CO 2  neutral o They address the poverty crisis 
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: secure market, so even small farmers can profit Clancy argues that large-scale biofuel farming for ethanol is not a pro-poor strategy: o It reduces (bio)diversity and so makes the communities more dependent and vulnerable (e.g. to market fluctuations) o It reduces food security, as prices increase and production decreases o The amount of corn needed to fill an SUV tank could feed a person for a year not efficient use of resources. *Deforestation fuelled by biofuel production not only reduces biodiversity but also releases vast amounts of carbon from the forest stores....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 02/22/2012 for the course AG 2373 taught by Professor Staff during the Fall '10 term at Texas State.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online