{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

SCFI - Reverse Spending DA

SCFI - Reverse Spending DA - SCFI 2010 M&M Reverse Spending...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
SCFI 2010 Reverse Spending DA M&M ___ of ___ Index 1 Saving…
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
SCFI 2010 Reverse Spending DA M&M ___ of ___ Plutonium 1NC A. Uniqueness- Funding for Pu-238 has been cut- Support exists but deficits make funding the key impediment. Space Policy Online 9 (provides news, information and analysis about the policy aspects of the full scope of the U.S. space program, “House and Senate Cut Plutonium Production Funding, Imperiling NASA Space Science Mission Plans”) http://spacepolicyonline.com/pages/index.php? option=com_content&view=article&id=48&Itemid=123 The House and Senate have cut the funding requested by the Department of Energy (DOE) to restart production of plutonium-238 (Pu-238) that is needed to power some NASA space science and lunar exploration spacecraft . Pu-238 is needed to fuel radioisotope power sources (RPSs) that supply power for systems and instruments on spacecraft that cannot rely on solar energy because they travel too far from the Sun or land on surfaces with long "nights" or other characteristics that make solar energy a poor or impossible choice. Under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, only DOE is allowed to possess, use and produce nuclear materials and facilities. Thus, NASA must rely on DOE to produce these power sources and the fuel. The National Research Council (NRC) issued a report on Pu-238 production for NASA missions in May 2009. It urged the government to restart Pu-238 production immediately or imperil NASA's lunar and planetary exploration plans . The NRC report emphasized that "the day of reckoning has arrived" and immediate action is required, estimating that it would cost at least $150 million to reestablish production . "Previous proposals to make this investment have not been enacted, and cost seems to be the major impediment . However, regardless of why these proposals have been rejected, the day of reckoning has arrived. NASA is already making mission limiting decisions based on the short supply of 238Pu. NASA is stretching out the pace of RPS-powered missions by eliminating RPSs as an option for some missions and delaying other missions that require RPSs until more 238Pu becomes available ." Pu-238 does not occur in nature, and the United States has not produced any since the late 1980s. It purchased Pu-238 for NASA missions from Russia during the 1990s, but those supplies reportedly are now exhausted . The NRC based its estimate of NASA's Pu-238 requirements on a letter NASA sent to DOE on April 29, 2008 detailing space science and lunar exploration missions planned for the next 20 years. The day the NRC report was released, DOE announced that it was requesting $30 million in FY2010 to implement that recommendation. However, the House cut that to $10 million when it passed the FY2010 Energy and Water appropriations bill (H.R. 3183) on July 17. The Senate went even further (S. 1436), zeroing the request . In its report on the bill (H. Rept. 111- 203), the House Appropriations Committee complained that DOE had not explained how it would use the funds. " While the Committee supports the re-start of Pu-238 for space missions and national
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page1 / 32

SCFI - Reverse Spending DA - SCFI 2010 M&M Reverse Spending...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon bookmark
Ask a homework question - tutors are online