{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

MGW10-MS-Nato-Cohesion-DA

MGW10-MS-Nato-Cohesion-DA - MGW'10 Smith/McFarland/Pryor...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–4. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
MGW ’10 NATO COHESION/UNITY DA Smith/McFarland/Pryor NATO COHESION/UNITY/CREDIBLITY DA Nato cohesion/unity/crediblity DA ......................................................................................................................... 1 NATO COHESION DA 1NC—NUCLEAR POLICY CHANGES (1/2) .............................................................. 3 NATO COHESION DA 1NC—NUCLEAR POLICY CHANGES (2/2) .............................................................. 4 NATO COHESION DA 1NC—afghanistan troops withdrawal (1/2) .................................................................... 5 NATO COHESION DA 1NC—afghanistan troops withdrawal (2/2) .................................................................... 6 ****Uniqueness strategic concept**** .................................................................................................................. 7 Uniqueness Strategic concept = crossroads ............................................................................................................. 8 UNIQUENESS Strategic Concept= Crossroads ................................................................................................... 11 UNIQUENESS Strategic Concept = Key Crossroads ........................................................................................... 12 UNIQUENESS Strategic Concept= Crossroads .................................................................................................... 13 Uniqueness- NATO crossroads .............................................................................................................................. 14 ***cohesion high now**** ................................................................................................................................... 15 U- NATO cohesive now ........................................................................................................................................ 16 U- NATO credibility increasing now--performance .............................................................................................. 17 U-COHESION NOW—STRATEGIC CONCEPT ............................................................................................... 18 U- NATO alive ...................................................................................................................................................... 19 NATO Alliance cohesion– Strong Now ................................................................................................................ 20 NATO DA Uniqueness: AT “AFGHANISTAN CRUSHES COHESION” ......................................................... 21 ****now key time***** ........................................................................................................................................ 22 U- now key time- nato cohesion ............................................................................................................................ 23 U- NATO credibility- now key time ...................................................................................................................... 24 UNIQUENESS Strategic Concept= Crossroads .................................................................................................... 25 ****links***** ...................................................................................................................................................... 26 NATO DA LINK- DECREASE US nuclear weapons .......................................................................................... 27 nato DA Unique link- TNW ................................................................................................................................. 28 NATO DA LINK—TNWS SIGNAL OF COMMITMENT ................................................................................ 29 NATO DA Link: US TNW Withdrawal From Turkey ......................................................................................... 30 NATO DA Link- US Decreases Nuclear Weapons ............................................................................................... 31 NATO DA Link- Nuclear Policy ........................................................................................................................... 32 NATO link – nuclear weapon policy key .............................................................................................................. 33 at presence of tnws hurt nato security ................................................................................................................... 34 NATO Link- Afghanistan K to NATO credibility ................................................................................................ 35 NATO DA Link: Afghanistan ............................................................................................................................... 36 NATO DA Link : AFghanistan .............................................................................................................................. 37 NATO DA Link Burden Sharing ........................................................................................................................... 38 ***specific internal links—other internal links embedded in link or impact eve**** ......................................... 39 NATO DA Cohesion- US Key internal link ......................................................................................................... 40 NATO DA Link- Burden Sharing ......................................................................................................................... 42 NATO DA INTERNAL Link --Turkey ................................................................................................................. 43 NATO DA: Internal Link- Cohesion Key to NATO ............................................................................................. 44 ***nato good*** .................................................................................................................................................... 45 NATO Good –LAUNDRY LIST ........................................................................................................................... 46 NATO: Good- Solves Afghanistan ........................................................................................................................ 47 nato good NATO nuclear weapons= Good ............................................................................................................ 48 NATO Good- solves terrorism ............................................................................................................................... 49 NATO Good – terrorism ........................................................................................................................................ 50 NATO Good IMPACT –European Stability ......................................................................................................... 51 1
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
MGW ’10 NATO COHESION/UNITY DA Smith/McFarland/Pryor NATO Good—multiple threats .............................................................................................................................. 52 nato good- Bioterror ............................................................................................................................................... 53 NATO Good- Cooperation .................................................................................................................................... 54 NATO Good- Democracy ...................................................................................................................................... 55 Nato – Prolif Impact ............................................................................................................................................... 56 Nato good – Ethnic Conflict ................................................................................................................................. 57 NATO good/bad – us Heg Impact ......................................................................................................................... 58 Nato good– Russian Aggression Impact ................................................................................................................................................................................ 59 2
Background image of page 2
MGW ’10 NATO COHESION/UNITY DA Smith/McFarland/Pryor NATO COHESION DA 1NC—NUCLEAR POLICY CHANGES (1/2) A. Nato cohesion is at a critical stage with new challenges- now is key Michta, Senior Scholar at the Woodrow Wilson Center, 4-1-10 (Andrew, Central Europe Digest , http://www.cepa.org/ced/view.aspx?record_id=231, SP) Today as we grapple with new challenges and out-of-area missions, NATO needs to revisit one old idea : its core territorial defense role. In a world where America has been hobbled by massive fiscal deficits , where China is positioning itself as a new hub of global power, where transnational threats continue to grow and where Russia reasserts itself in the “near abroad,” the United States and Europe need to reach consensus on the meaning of common defense . If they are unwilling or unable to do so, the current drift will continue. To maintain allied cohesion and provide strategic reassurance to the allies along the periphery, the New Strategic Concept
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 4
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}