CP AFF NSS TIA 15

CP AFF NSS TIA 15 - WNDI 2010 Tia & Tony 1 AT: NSS CP...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–5. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
WNDI 2010 1 AT: NSS CP NSS Counterplan Aff
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Double bind – either CP links to the net-benefit because the process isn’t sufficient to overcome substantive disagreements, or the perm solves 100% of the link. NSS isn’t ready – the CP forces immediate release of a document that isn’t ready. Supercharges our claims that it doesn’t solve and links to politics Delay – Even if the NSS gets implemented, it takes awhile, case is a DA Perm – Do both. Solves the link to the net-benefit. Perm – Do the plan through the NSS. Either the plan is the only thing in the NSS and Obama gets wrecked for releasing an incomplete document, or the whole NSS links to politics because it contains a ton of stuff Congress doesn’t like.
Background image of page 2
WNDI 2010 3 AT: NSS CP 2AC Consult CP – Consult Theory Consult is unfair and not competitive – a) Fairness – We’re forced to make “say no” arguments, which the neg can concede to win a link to the Allied Prolif DA. This gives the negative to link to the biggest DA on the topic. Also forces the aff to defend contrived normal means against a counterplan which is designed to moot the whole 1AC, which makes it impossible for us to win. b) Infinitely Regressive – 194 countries, plus international organizations. Lit doesn’t check because the neg just needs one card that says we should talk to another country to win on any risk of a contrived net benefit, but there’s no comparative ev we SHOULDN’T bother consulting with our allies. Broad topic doesn’t justify, it’s what the community voted for and shouldn’t change whether CP’s are fair. c) Education – Everyone knows consult is designed to be a generic shortcut – incentivizes lazy research and trades off with more educational aff-specific strategies. Other CP’s and reading the net-benefit as a DA solves neg flex and education. And not real world, the US never gives other countries a “binding veto.” Counterplan also isn’t competitive – it’s both textually plan plus, because it includes the entire text of the plan, and functionally plan plus because it just tacks on consultation. Their “resolved” argument is stupid because it’s a preamble, not the actual resolution. We can perm the part of the counterplan that changes normal means – nothing in our plan commits us to “certainty” or “immediacy.” The only way this counterplan competes is if you allow any other counterplan which competes for the same reasons, which justifies Delay and Condition the Plan on Space. Reason to vote aff – introducing the CP fundamentally changed 2AC strategic calculus about where to generate offense, which affects the whole debate. It also sets a precedent against abusive counterplans and helps drive argument norms. At worst, legitimizes the perm to do the counterplan.
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
2AC NSS CP – Perms ( ) Perm – do both ( ) Perm – do the CP – plan doesn’t specify it actor Textual competition is best – it checks infinite regression to the worst counterplans which
Background image of page 4
Image of page 5
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 19

CP AFF NSS TIA 15 - WNDI 2010 Tia & Tony 1 AT: NSS CP...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 5. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online