7 Patterns-442-12-by6

support multiple traversal strategies for aggregate

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: on a Composite structure Again problem with external iterators, because traversal algorithm may be nontrivial Solution: Use internal iteration (let aggregate handle iteration in one shot) or cursor-type iterators (let aggregate deGine the next object to be processed; store only iteration status in iterator) In the second case, the composite must provide a fairly rich tree-based protocol (e.g., Gind father, children, siblings of a node, etc.) 89 Group of related objects must support many kinds of operations Examples: Lexi glyphs must support formatting, spell-checking, hyphenation, etc. All numeric classes in a programming language must support addition, subtraction, multiplication, etc. All syntax objects in a syntax tree must support code generation, metrics computation, data Glow analysis, etc. 90 Visitor pattern: The nave solution An example: Visiting an abstract syntax tree Node TypeCheck() GenerateCode() PrettyPrint() Pattern Visitor pattern Problems of the nave solution: Pattern -- Information about various functions is distributed across many (element) classes -- Hefty element classes (each getting a new protocol for each function) -- Hard to understand and maintain code ... AssignmentNode TypeCheck() GenerateCode() PrettyPrint() AssignmentNode TypeCheck() GenerateCode() PrettyPrint() 91 -- Hard to add new functions Better solution: -- Encapsulate each function in a class (called a visitor) -- Create abstract superclass for all visitor classes 92 Visitor pattern (cont Applicability d) Pattern Pattern Visitor pattern Applicability (cont d) An additional example of applicability (compiler) Actions to type-check program to be compiled depend on each construct. The same is true when generating object code, computing metrics, etc. A group of related objects must each support different kinds of operations Caveat: The actual method executed depends both on the class of the receiving object and the operation being performed Example: (numeric classes) Actual code executed depends both on the class of receiver and argument 3 + 5 does integer addition 3 + 5.5 Gloating point addition 93 94 Visitor p...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 02/23/2012 for the course COMP 553 taught by Professor Ajay during the Spring '12 term at Ill. Chicago.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online