15111 - Fraud in medical research Richard Smith Editor BMJ September 2001 What I want to talk about Why fraud matters Britain's most dramatic case

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–9. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Fraud in medical research Richard Smith Editor, BMJ September 2001
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
What I want to talk about Why fraud matters Britain’s most dramatic case of fraud What is fraud? How common is it? Why does it happen? What does a country need to respond? A comment on COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics)
Background image of page 2
Why fraud matters It’s like child abuse: we didn’t recognise it, now we see alot It undermines public trust in medical research and doctors It corrupts the scientific record and leads to false conclusions Most countries do not have good systems of either treatment or prevention
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Britain’s most dramatic case of fraud
Background image of page 4
August 1996: a major breakthrough Worldwide media coverage of doctors in London reimplanting an ectopic pregnancy and a baby being born Doctors had been trying to do this for a century. It was a huge achievement
Background image of page 5

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
August 1996: a major breakthrough Achieved by Malcolm Pearce, a senior lecturer in at St George’s Hospital Medical School in London A world famous expert on ultrasonography in obstetrics A story from a paper in the British Journal of Obstetrics and Gyneacology . Pearce was an assistant editor.
Background image of page 6
August 1996: a major breakthrough A second author on the case report was Geoffrey Chamberlain, editor of the journal, president of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, and professor and head of department at St George’s. The same issue contained a randomised controlled trial also by Malcolm Pearce -- and others.
Background image of page 7

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
are fraudulent A front page story in the Daily Mail exposed the two papers as fraudulent.
Background image of page 8
Image of page 9
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 02/23/2012 for the course PHARM 290 taught by Professor Staff during the Fall '10 term at Rutgers.

Page1 / 25

15111 - Fraud in medical research Richard Smith Editor BMJ September 2001 What I want to talk about Why fraud matters Britain's most dramatic case

This preview shows document pages 1 - 9. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online