This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full DocumentThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 6.055J / 2.038J The Art of Approximation in Science and Engineering Spring 2008 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms . 57 7 Dimensions Let A be the atomic mass of the atom; it is (roughly) the number of pro a a tons and neutrons in the nucleus. Although A is called a mass, it is dimensionless. Each atom occupies a cube of side length a ∼ 3 Å, and has mass Am proton . The density of the substance is mass Am proton ρ = volume ∼ (3 Å ) 3 . You do not need to remember or look up m proton if you multiply this fraction by unity in the form of N A / N A , where N A is Avogadro’s number: Am proton N A . ρ ∼ (3 Å ) 3 × N A The numerator is A g, because that is how N A is defined. The denominator is 3 10 − 23 cm 3 × 6 10 23 = 18 . · · So instead of remembering m proton , you need to remember N A . However, N A is more famil iar than m proton because N A arises in chemistry and physics. Using N A also emphasizes the connection between microscopic and macroscopic values. Carrying out the calculations: ρ ∼ A g cm − 3 . 18 The table compares the estimate against reality. Most every Element ρ estimated ρ actual day elements have atomic masses between 15 and 150 , so the Li . 39 . 54 density estimate explains why most densities lie between 1 and H 2 O 1 . 1 . 10 g cm − 3 . It also shows why, for materials physics, cgs units are more convenient than SI units are. A typical cgs density of Si 1 . 56 2 . 4 a solid is 3 g cm − 3 , and 3 is a modest number and easy to re Fe 3 . 11 7 . 9 member and work with. However, a typical SI density of a solid Hg 11 . 2 13 . 5 3000 kg m − 3 . Numbers such as 3000 are unwieldy. Each time Au 10 . 9 19 . 3 you use it, you have to think, ‘How many powers of ten were U 13 . 3 18 . 7 there again?’ So the table tabulates densities using the cgs units of g cm − 3 . I even threw a joker into the pack – water is not an element! – but the density estimate is amazingly accurate. 7.4.3 Physical interpretation The previous method, dimensional analysis, is mostly mathematical. As a second computa tion of a , we show you a method that is mostly physics. Besides checking the Bohr radius, it provides a physical interpretation of it. The Bohr radius is the radius of the orbit with the lowest energy (the ground state). The energy is a sum of kinetic and potential energy. This division suggests, again, a divideandconquer approach: first the kinetic energy, then the potential energy. 6.055 / Art of approximation 58 What is the origin of the kinetic energy? The electron does not orbit in any classical sense....
View
Full Document
 Spring '08
 SanjoyMahajan
 Energy, Kinetic Energy, Potential Energy, Bohr radius

Click to edit the document details