USLaw+NativeAmsW08Wk10

USLaw+NativeAmsW08Wk10 - US Law & Native Americans...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–9. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
US Law & Native Americans CRM/LAW C158, W ‘08 Week 10 Prof. Justin B. Richland TA: Sam Lane M/W: 12:30-1:50 SSL 248
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
CLASS OUTLINE ü Tribal Economic Development: Gaming ü Balancing Culture and Colonization in Tribal Law ü Bringing Custom to the Courtroom ü Conclusion Remarks: Who Indians Are
Background image of page 2
I. Tribal Economic Development: Tribal Gaming Last Week: Tribal efforts at economic self- determination. Influenced by and reliant upon Federal Indian Law and Policies: Allotment --> Tribal Land Acquisition / Consolidation IRA, ISDEA (BIA management) --> Mining, Oil, Timber
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
I. Tribal Economic Development: Tribal Gaming Areas of economic self-governance also demand reductions of tribal sovereignty Self-governance has created opportunities for tribal-state agreements. (e.g. Oklahoma: Tribal Government Assistance program. Tribal-State Gaming Compacts under Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.
Background image of page 4
I. Tribal Economic Development: Tribal Gaming California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians 480 U.S. 202 (1987) FACTS Cabazon Band of Indians (Federally recognized, pop. 38) conduct bingo hall and card club on reservation. Bingo hall operated pursuant to Federally approved ordinance. State of CA seeks to apply CA Penal Code to which limits Bingo operations in state only QuickTimeª and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompress are needed to see this picture. QuickTimeª and TIFF (Uncompressed) are needed to see th Chief Cabazon (circa 1840s) Cabazon members (circa 1990s)
Background image of page 5

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
I. Tribal Economic Development: Tribal Gaming California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians 480 U.S. 202 (1987) FACTS Riverside Co. (where reservation is located) seeks to apply county ordinance which prohibit poker and other card games. CA a P.L. 280 state with broad criminal adjudicatory jurisdiction over all Indian QuickTimeª and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompress are needed to see this picture. QuickTimeª and TIFF (Uncompressed) are needed to see th Chief Cabazon (circa 1840s) Cabazon members (circa 1990s)
Background image of page 6
I. Tribal Economic Development: Tribal Gaming California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians 480 U.S. 202 (1987) RULE: PL 280 does not grant CA regulatory authority over Indians in Indian Country. State law can overcome Federal pre-emption where it is pursuant to “compelling” state interest that outweighs federal interests in Indian Country. DECISION: QuickTimeª and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompress are needed to see this picture. QuickTimeª and TIFF (Uncompressed) are needed to see th Chief Cabazon (circa 1840s) Cabazon members (circa 1990s)
Background image of page 7

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
I. Tribal Economic Development: Tribal Gaming California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians 480 U.S. 202 (1987) ANALYSIS: State claim that application of its gambling prohibitions to Cabazon is without merit. State gaming scheme is not criminal/prohibitory but civil regulatory, because the state does allow some forms of gaming (State lottery).
Background image of page 8
Image of page 9
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 68

USLaw+NativeAmsW08Wk10 - US Law & Native Americans...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 9. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online