{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

Quantum_Operators_Spin

Quantum_Operators_Spin - Quantum operator methods p 1 SETUP...

This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

Quantum operator methods p. 1 SETUP: Consider a quantum particle with some new properties that we can measure. We won’t talk much about the physics of these measurements yet, but the formalism of quantum mechanics will teach us a great deal, just from operator methods! Consider a hermitian operator S x which yields only 2 possible measurement outcomes, +1 or -1. (It will represent the measurement of “the component of spin in the x direction”. For now think of it as a measurement of some property of a particle which can be “rightwards” or “leftwards”…) With only two possible measurement outcomes, S x has only two (orthonormal) eigenvectors. People get tired of writing out complicated “ket names”, so a simple, common notation is S x + = + , S x - = - 1 - I suppose you might refer to the |+> state as a “spin right” state, and |-> as “spin left”, does that seem reasonable to you? Stare at these two eigen-equations and make sure you, and your group, understand the notation: which symbols are the eigenvectors here, what are the eigenvalues, in those equations? What can you say about, e.g. - + ? (Explain) Now consider a second observable, with corresponding Hermitian operator, S z. This operator is NOT the same as S x, although it does have the same spectrum. Since the eigenvectors of S z are different from those of S x, we need to give them a different name. Here, people conventionally name the ket with a symbol : S z = , S z = - 1 (Since S z measures the vertical, or z, component of spin, I suppose you might refer to the | > state as a “spin up”, and | > as “spin down” particle, does that seem reasonable to you?)

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}