Unformatted text preview: ones, reasonable, and were Goldman’s religious rights violated? Holding: Court of Appeals affirmed (Goldman may not wear the headpiece) Reasoning: The Supreme Court based their decision behind the strict Air Force clothing regulations. The Court stated that standardized uniforms encourage subordination of members. An Air Force document specifically stated, in minute detail, their outfit requirements. The Air Force promotes no difference in privileges other than rank. While a sensitive issue, The Court believed it would not be correct to allow someone to violate the clothing requirements....
View Full Document
- Fall '11
- Berkshire Hathaway, Weinberger, bank holding company, Simcha Goldman