Ordinary &amp; Partial Differential Equations - Reynolds (2000) - Chapter 5 - Bifurcations

# Ordinary & Partial Differential Equations - Reynolds (2000) - Chapter 5 - Bifurcations

This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

CHAPTER 5 Bifurcations I n practice, we often deal with ode s which contain parameters (unspeciFed constants) whose values can profoundly in±uence the dynamical behavior of the system. ²or example, suppose we model population changes for a species. The birth and death rates of the species would be examples of parameters whose values would substantially impact that behavior of solutions of the underlying differential equation. Example 5 . 0 . 2 . Consider the ode d x d t = μ x , where μ is a parameter. The solution of this equation is x ( t )= x 0 e μ t , where x 0 = x ( 0 ) . Notice that if μ > 0, the solutions exhibit exponential growth, whereas if μ < 0 we observe exponential decay. If μ = 0, solutions are constant. The critical value μ = 0 marks the “boundary” between two very different types of dynamical behavior. Defnition 5 . 0 . 3 . Consider a system of ode s of the form x ± ( t f ( x ; μ ) , where μ is a parameter. A bifurcation is any major qualitative change in the dynamical behavior of the system in response to varying the parameter μ . In the previous example, we would say that a bifurcation occurs at μ = 0, because the equilibrium x = 0 changes from stable ( μ < 0) to unstable ( μ > 0). 5.1. Three Basic Bifurcations There are many ways that the qualitative behavior of a system can be drastically altered in response to changes in parameters. Equilibria and/or periodic solu- tions can be created or destroyed, or they can change their stability. In what follows, we will survey several common types of bifurcations. ²or simplicity, we 140

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
bifurcations 141 will deal primarily with ode s with only one dependent variable. An excellent reference for this material is provided by Strogatz [ 11 ]. Saddle-node bifurcations. First, we discuss one common mechanism for the birth or destruction of an equilibrium solution. The canonical example to keep in mind is given by the ode d x d t = μ + x 2 .( 5 . 1 ) Suppose μ < 0. The equilibria satisfy x 2 + μ = 0, which implies that x = ± - μ are the two equilibria of the system. To determine whether they are stable, we compute that the “Jacobian” of f ( x )= x 2 + μ is simply f ² ( x 2 x . By calculating f ² ( - μ 2 - μ > 0, we ±nd that - μ is an unstable equilibrium. Similarly, since f ² ( - - μ - 2 - μ < 0, it follows that - - μ is a stable equilibrium. Next, suppose that μ = 0. There is only one equilibrium, namely x = 0. Although it is non-hyperbolic, it is easy to check (via separation of variables) that this equilibrium is unstable. Finally, suppose μ > 0. Then x 2 + μ > 0 for all x , implying that there are no equilibria. In summary, as μ increases from negative to positive, two equilibria (one stable and one unstable) merge and annihilate each other, leaving no equilibria if μ > 0. Clearly μ = 0 is a bifurcation point, and this type of bifurcation is called a saddle-node bifurcation .A minor adjustment of Equation ( 5 . 1 ) reveals that saddle-node bifurcations can also create new equilibria as the parameter μ increases. The equation x ² = - μ + x 2 experiences a saddle-node bifurcation at μ = 0, creating two equilibria for μ > 0.
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

## This note was uploaded on 02/27/2012 for the course MATH 532 taught by Professor Reynolds during the Fall '11 term at VCU.

### Page1 / 26

Ordinary & Partial Differential Equations - Reynolds (2000) - Chapter 5 - Bifurcations

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online