ls1_unit_2

ls1_unit_2 - ON CLASSICAL ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS II RAYS T...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
ON CLASSICAL ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS 6 II. RAYS: THE EIKONAL TREATMENT OF GEOMETRIC OPTICS 6 Since ancient times, the notion of ray or beam propagation has been one of the most enduring and fundamental concepts in optical physics. As a zeroth order approximation we might consider a plane wave to be a model of a beam and its propagation vector to be a model of a ray . This is a reasonable start, but it is a much too restricted view and we can do much better. What we need is a solution to Maxwell's equations which is like a plane wave, but limited in spatial extent. One approach, the simplest, is called variously ray, Gaussian or geometric optics. A M AXWELLIAN D ERIVATION OF THE E IKONAL E QUATION: To fully understand geometric optics in the context of Maxwell's equations, we start by writing the electric and magnetic fields as pseudo-simple waves -- viz. r E r r , ω ( ) = r e r r , ω ( ) exp i k 0 S r r , ω ( ) [ ] [ II-1a ] r H r r , ω ( ) = r h r r , ω ( ) exp i k 0 S r r , ω ( ) [ ] [ II-1b ] where k 0 = ω μ 0 ε 0 = ω c It is assumed that r e r r , ω ( ) and r h r r , ω ( ) are weak functions of position . The scalar phase function S r r , ω ( ) is the spatially varying phase of the pseudo-simple wave. For the cases of pseudo-plane waves and pseudo-spherical waves the phase function is given, respectively, by k 0 S r r , ω ( ) = x k x + y k y + z k z [ II-2a ] 6 See, for example, Max Born and Emil Wolf, Principle of Optics , Pergamon Press (1986), Chapter 3.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
7 and k 0 S r r , ω ( ) = k 0 x 2 + y 2 + z 2 [ II-2b ] We now substitute these pseudo-simple wave expressions ( i.e. Equations [ II-1]) into Maxwell's equations to obtain exp i k 0 S r r , ω ( ) [ ] r × r e r r , ω ( ) i k 0 r S r r , ω ( ) × r e r r , ω ( ) { } = i μ 0 ck 0 r h r r , ω ( ) exp i k 0 S r r , ω ( ) [ ] [ exp i k 0 S r r , ω ( ) [ ] r × r h r r , ω ( ) i k 0 r S r r , ω ( ) × r h r r , ω ( ) { } = i ε r r , ω ( ) ck 0 r e r r , ω ( ) exp i k 0 S r r , ω ( ) [ ] [ exp i k 0 S r r , ω ( ) [ ] r ⋅ε r r , ω ( ) r e r r , ω ( ) [ ] i k 0 ε r r , ω ( ) r S r r , ω ( ) r e r r , ω ( ) { } = 0 [ exp i k 0 S r r , ω ( ) [ ] r r h r r , ω ( ) i k 0 r S r r , ω ( ) r h r r , ω ( ) { } = 0 [ Rearranging, we obtain r S r r , ω ( ) × r e r r , ω ( ) μ 0 c r h r r , ω ( ) = i k 0 [ ] 1 r × r e r r , ω ( ) [ II-4a ] r S r r , ω ( ) × r h r r , ω ( ) + ε r r , ω ( ) c r e r r , ω ( ) = i k 0 [ ] 1 r × r h r r , ω ( ) [ II-4b ] r S r r , ω ( ) ⋅ε r r , ω ( ) r e r r , ω ( ) [ ] = i k 0 [ ] 1 r ⋅ε r r , ω ( ) r e r r , ω ( ) [ ] [ II-4c ] r S r r , ω ( ) r h r r , ω ( ) = i k 0 [ ] 1 r r h r r , ω ( ) [ II-4d ] In the ray , Gaussian or geometric approximation we assume that we may neglect the RHS's of these equations. To get something useful we multiply through the first equation (
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 02/29/2012 for the course PHYSICS 216 taught by Professor Staff during the Fall '11 term at BU.

Page1 / 16

ls1_unit_2 - ON CLASSICAL ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS II RAYS T...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online