# hw5_soln - Complex Analysis Fall 2007 Homework 5 Solutions...

This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Complex Analysis Fall 2007 Homework 5: Solutions 1.5.22 If z = x + iy then z 4 = ( x 4- 6 x 2 y 2 + y 4 ) + i (4 x 3 y- 4 xy 3 ) so that u = Re( z 4 ) = x 4- 6 x 2 y 2 + y 4 and v = Im( z 4 ) = 4 x 3 y- 4 xy 3 . We find that ∂ 2 u ∂x 2 = ∂ ∂x ( 4 x 3- 12 xy 2 ) = 12 x 2- 12 y 2 and ∂ 2 u ∂y 2 = ∂ ∂y (- 12 x 2 y + 4 y 3 ) =- 12 x 2 + 12 y 2 so that ∇ 2 u = ∂ 2 u ∂x 2 + ∂ 2 u ∂y 2 = ( 12 x 2- 12 y 2 ) + (- 12 x 2 + 12 y 2 ) = 0 . Since u is a polynomial in x and y its second-order partials are continuous and ∇ 2 u = 0, u is harmonic. We leave the analogous computation involving v to the student. 1.5.32 Claim: If u and v are functions defined on an open set A , u and v satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations and u is harmonic on A , then v is a harmonic conjugate of u on A . We are given ∂u ∂x = ∂v ∂y ∂u ∂y =- ∂v ∂x . Since u and v already satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations, to show that v is conjugate to u it suffices to prove that v is also harmonic. Since u is harmonic, it’s second-order partial derivatives are all continuous (by definition). The Cauchy-Riemann equations above then imply the same is true of v ’s second-order partials. So all we need to do to prove that v is harmonic is verify that ∇ 2 v = 0. Appealing to the Cauchy-Riemann equations again we 1 have ∇ 2 v = ∂ 2 v ∂x 2 + ∂v ∂y 2 = ∂ ∂x ∂v ∂x + ∂ ∂y ∂v ∂y = ∂ ∂x- ∂u ∂y + ∂ ∂y ∂u ∂x =- ∂ 2 u ∂x∂y +- ∂ 2 u ∂y∂x = since the continuity of the second-order mixed partials implies their equality. Hence, v is harmonic. As noted above, this completes the proof. Notice that the only facts we used were that u and v were related by the Cauchy-Riemann equations and that u had continuous second-order partial derivatives. In fact, if these are the only assumptions that we make then we can, in fact, prove that both u and v are harmonic and that they are conjugate. Now on to the problem at hand. Since we are given that u is harmonic on the disk the claim shows that it is enough to verify that u and v satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations. To (hopefully) clarify things slightly, let me alter the notation of the problem. Let’s define: v ( x, y ) = c + Z y y ∂u ∂x ( x, t ) dt- Z x x ∂u ∂y ( s, y ) ds By the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (the real-variable version) we have ∂v ∂y ( x, y ) = ∂ ∂y Z y y ∂u ∂x ( x, t ) dt- ∂ ∂y Z x x ∂u ∂y ( s, y ) ds = ∂u ∂x ( x, y ) since the second expression is not a function of y . This is one of the Cauchy-Riemann equations. Similar reasoning gives ∂v ∂x ( x, y ) = ∂ ∂x Z y y ∂u ∂x ( x, t ) dt- ∂u ∂y ( x, y ) ....
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### Page1 / 9

hw5_soln - Complex Analysis Fall 2007 Homework 5 Solutions...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online