CHE113INTO6

CHE113INTO6 - CHE113 Forensic Science Nicolas Canel...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
CHE113 Forensic Science Nicolas Canel Forensic Science Introduction Forensics in Court -Federal Courts use Daubert Standard -Many State Courts use Daubert -About Half of State and Most Local Courts still use Frye. Joiner Case (1995) –Case asserted that PCB’s caused cancer in plaintiff –Tried to establish a causal link between PCB’s and cancer based upon animal models. –“ Conclusions and methodology are not separate. Experts commonly extrapolate from existing data but nothing requires a court to admit opinion evidence that is connected to the data only by the expert themselves .” –The court may conclude that there is too great a gap between the data and the opinion. Kumho Tire Case (1999) –Tire blowout liability case. Plaintiff expert wanted to testify that the blowout was due to defect rather than under-inflation. –Did not allow plaintiff expert testimony since the “test” by the expert was unreliable and made up by him (i.e., baseball batter designing his own “strike zone”).
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 03/02/2012 for the course CHE 113 taught by Professor Spencer during the Spring '08 term at Syracuse.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online