Slides for test 3

Slides for test 3 - True if the parties intended him to...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Slides for test 3 Oral testimony in court about the terms of a written contract refers to: Parol evidence May Jim assign his right to receive $1000 to his brother Sam? Yes May Susan assign her rig to have her house painted to her buyer? Maybe May jim delegate his duty to paint to Sam? It might depend A third party beneficiary can sue to enforce a contract even though not a party of it.
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: True, if the parties intended him to benefit Jim wants to hunt. Susan realizes she doesn’t have $1000. Jim and Susan: Can mutually rescind the K (which is itself a separate contract) 11/1/11 The focus in a strict liability case is on the reasonableness of the defendant’s behavior. The focus of a negligence case in on the product...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 03/07/2012 for the course GEN BUS 202 taught by Professor Parks during the Fall '11 term at Boise State.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online